国际话语权研究的学科谱系探究

Exploring the Disciplinary Spectrum of International Discourse Studies

近年来,国际话语权研究受到政界和学界普遍关注。厘清其学科谱系是国际话语权研究的基础和前提,将有助于从学科发展的维度寻求原理和方法论的支撑。研究发现,20世纪话语哲学的理论基础源于维特根斯坦的“话语游戏”、福柯“话语与权力”、德里达的“解构”和哈贝马斯的“公共领域”等不同哲学流派对话语的论述。这为以文本为导向的话语分析提供了指导原则,但在具体的分析过程中,颇具学科特色的国际关系、语言学、传播学、公共关系学等学科研究方法丰富和夯实了话语分析作为研究工具的使用。同时,伴随计算机辅助话语分析软件的使用,学科交叉融合的特征日益明显,加之全球化时代国内热点国际化、国际热点国内社会化的特征,使得多元化的研究主题具有更为深远的国际影响。

In recent years, the study of international discourse has received widespread attention from political and academic circles. A clear understanding of its spectrum is the basis and prerequisite for the study of international discourse, which will help to find the theoretical and methodological support from the dimension of disciplinary development. The study finds that the theoretical foundations of 20th century discourse philosophy are derived from Wittgenstein’s "discourse games", Foucault’s "discourse and power", Derrida’s "deconstruction" and Habermas’ "public sphere". This provides the guiding principle for text-oriented discourse analysis, but in the specific analysis process, the rather discipline-specific research methods of international relations, linguistics,communication and public relations enrich and solidify the use of discourse analysis as a research tool. At the same time, along with the use of computer-aided discourse analysis software, interdisciplinary features are increasingly pronounced, which, together with the characteristics of internationalization of domestic hotspots and domestic socialization of international hotspots in the era of globalization, make the diversified research themes have a more far-reaching international impact.