摘要
《赞布摄类学》与《达仓热堆摄类学》是成书于公元17世纪末的两部重要的摄类理论,但不少史料及研究人员误认为两者为同一理论,对摄类学发展演变,以乃藏传因明发展历史考察带来了诸多疑问。文章以史料考察、两种摄类学文本相比较的方法,从两者为同一理论的学说原由作为切入点,分别考述了两种摄类学产生的年代、作者、内容、特色及差异,以此反驳了两者为同一理论的观点。
Both Ratoi Collected Topics in Logic(ra stod bsdus grwa in Tibetan)and Tsenpo Collected Topics in Logic(btsan po bsdus grwa in Tibetan)were published sometimes at the end of 17th century.It is commonly believed that they belong to same text regardless in the teachings or in the historical documents or the academic research findings.This article compares the historical records and both of the texts,discusses the origin of the theory which considers that they are same texts,the origin and development of the Ratoi Collected Topics in Logic and that of Tsenpo Collected Topics in Logic.
作者
次旺南木加
Tsewang Namgye(School of Humanity,Tibet University,Lhasa,850000)
出处
《西藏大学学报(藏文版)》
2022年第3期149-163,196,共16页
Journal of Tibet university
基金
2018年国家社科基金冷门绝学项目“藏传因明古籍文献搜集、整理编目与研究”阶段性成果,项目号:2018VJX036。
关键词
赞布摄类学
达仓热堆摄类学
异同
Ratoi Collected Topics in Logic
Tsenpo Collected Topics in Logic
differences
relations