ADI教学模式的教学实践研究——以“遗传信息的转录”教学为例
摘要
论证探究式教学模式(ADI)是将科学论证融入科学探究活动中的一种教学模式。本文通过利用相关科学实验将科学探究过程和课堂论证过程相结合,阐释如何将ADI教学模式引进生物学课堂教学,落实生物学学科的核心素养。
出处
《新课程教学（电子版）》
2022年第19期125-126,共2页
Teaching and Learning of New Curriculum
二级参考文献16
-
1中华人民共和国教育部.义务教育生物学课程标准.北京:北京师范大学出版社.2011:2.
-
2Newton P., Driver R., Osborne J.. The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science. International Journal of Science Education,1999,21(5):553-576.
-
3Duschl R., Ellenbogan K., Erduran S.. Promoting argumenta- tion in middle school science classrooms: A Project SEPIA e- valuation. A paper presented at the 1999 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Boston.
-
4Cavagnetto A. R.. Argument to foster scientific literacy: A re- view of argument interventions in K-12 science contexts. Re- view of Educational Research,2010,80(3):336-371.
-
5Sampson V., Grooms J.. Science as Argument-Driven Inquiry: The impact on students' conceptions of NOS. Paper presented at the 2008 Annual International Conference of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching (NARST). Balt- imore, MD.
-
6Sampson V., Gleim L.. Argument-Driven Inquiry to promote the understanding of important concepts &practices in biology. The American biology teacher, 2009, 71(8): 465-472.
-
7Sampson V., Grooms J., Enderle P.. New instruments that can be used by researchers to assess three different aspects of sc- ience proficiency. Paper presented at the 2011 Fall Conferen- ce for the Society for Research on Educational Effective- (SREE). Washington, DC.
-
8Enderle P., Grooms J., Sampson V.. The importance of using multiple measures to assess science proficiency. Paper presen- ted at the 2011 Annual Conference of the Association of Sci- ence Teacher Educators (ASTE). Clearwater, FL.
-
9Liang L., Chen X., Chen S. et al. Student Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry (SUSSI): Revision and Further Validation of an Assessment Instrument. Paper presented at the 2006 AnnualConference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), San Francisco, CA.
-
10Enderle P., Walker J., Dorgan C. et al. Assessment of Scie- ntific Argumentation in the Classroom: An Observation Proto- col. Paper presented at the 2010 International Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST).
共引文献26
-
1郑福汉.地市报要提高办报质量[J].中国地市报人,2000(9):34-34.
-
2施容,范锴,陈志伟.初中生对人兽混合胚胎议题的论证能力调查[J].生物学通报,2013,48(5):46-51. 被引量：3
-
3郭莉,杨文源.基于发现学习的“自由组合定律”教学设计[J].生物学通报,2013,48(9):38-42.
-
4何嘉媛,刘恩山.论证探究式教学模型的设计和运用[J].生物学通报,2013,48(10):25-29. 被引量：12
-
5何嘉媛,王璇,刘恩山.基于论证探究式教学模型的行动研究[J].生物学通报,2013,48(11):21-27. 被引量：23
-
6赵喜亭,秦凌月,刘亚丽.植物生理学教学中学生科学探究能力的培养[J].河南科技学院学报（社会科学版）,2013,33(12):128-129.
-
7林静,张锋.实验课堂的“论证”策略在培养学生科学素养中的运用[J].中学生物学,2014,30(9):5-7. 被引量：1
-
8陈菲菲,范锴,陈志伟.社会性科学议题教学对高二学生论证能力的影响[J].生物学通报,2015,50(5):17-21. 被引量：2
-
9黄静.运用论证探究式教学模型培养高中生的科学探究素养——“分离定律的应用”课例展示[J].北极光,2018(12):126-127.
-
10陈慧谦.数字教学环境下开展光合作用探究实验的尝试[J].中学生物教学,2016,0(10):37-39. 被引量：1
