期刊文献+

粉末活性炭去除原水中典型抗生素的试验 被引量:3

Experiment of Typical Antibiotics Removal in Raw Water by Powdered Activated Carbon
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章研究了粉末活性炭对原水中4类18种典型抗生素的去除效果。在粉末活性炭投加量为10~30 mg/L、反应时间为30~1 800 min条件下,抗生素总去除率为13.8%~52.5%,去除率随着粉末活性炭投加量和反应时间的增加而升高,抗生素在活性炭上的吸附动力学可用拟二级动力学模型表征。不同种类抗生素的可去除性存在差异,大环内酯类和四环素类去除效果相对较好,磺胺类去除效果一般,氯霉素类较难去除。结果说明,可结合原水系统预处理或水厂头部预处理环节的粉末活性炭投加,一定程度上吸附去除原水中的抗生素污染,减轻后续水厂净水处理压力。 The removal effect of powdered activated carbon to 18 kinds(four types) of antibiotics in the raw water was studied in this paper. Results showed that, the removal rate of antibiotics by powdered activated carbon were 13.8%~52.5% in the dosage of powdered activated carbon were 10~30 mg/L and the reaction time were 30~1 800 min, and removal rates was increased with the increased of powdered activated carbon dosages and reaction time. The adsorption kinetic could in accord with second-order kinetic model. There were differences in the removability of different antibiotics, it were higher removal rates for macrolides and tetracyclines, general removal effect for sulfonamides, and lower removal rates for chloramphenicols. The results showed that addition of powdered activated carbon in the pretreatment of raw water system can absorb and remove the antibiotic, and reduce the pressure of subsequent water purification in WTPs.
作者 姜蕾 金磊 胡涛 JIANG Lei;JIN Lei;HU Tao(Shanghai National Engineering Center of Urban Water Resources Co.,Ltd.,Shanghai 200082,China)
出处 《净水技术》 CAS 2022年第12期127-130,152,共5页 Water Purification Technology
基金 国家重点研发计划:长江、黄河流域饮用水源高风险污染物工艺可处理性研究(2021YFC3200805-3) 上海市社会发展重点研发课题(21DZ1202104)。
关键词 抗生素 粉末活性炭 吸附 去除率 原水 antibiotics powdered activated carbon adsorption removal rate raw water
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1陈涛,李彦文,莫测辉,高鹏,吴小莲,屈相龙.广州污水厂磺胺和喹诺酮抗生素污染特征研究[J].环境科学与技术,2010,33(6):144-147. 被引量:42
  • 2王冉,刘铁铮,王恬.抗生素在环境中的转归及其生态毒性[J].生态学报,2006,26(1):265-270. 被引量:198
  • 3叶计朋,邹世春,张干,徐维海.典型抗生素类药物在珠江三角洲水体中的污染特征[J].生态环境,2007,16(2):384-388. 被引量:133
  • 4谭建华,唐才明,余以义,彭先芝.高效液相色谱法同时分析城市河水中的多种抗生素[J].色谱,2007,25(4):546-549. 被引量:49
  • 5Heberer T. Occurrence, fate, and removal of pharmaceutical residues in the aquatic environment: a review of recent research data. Toxicology letters, 2002, 131(1): 5~17.
  • 6Kolpin D W, Furlong E T, Meyer M T, et al. Pharmaceuti- cals, hormones, and other organic wastewater contaminants in US streams, 1999~2000: A national reconnaissance. Environ- mental science & technology, 2002, 36(6):1202~1211.
  • 7Daughton C G, Ternes T A. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: agents of subtle change. Environ- mental health perspectives, 1999, 107(6): 907~938.
  • 8Kummerer K, Al-Ahmad A, Mersch-Sundermann V. Biode- gradability of some antibiotics, elimination of the genotoxieity and affection of wastewater bacteria in a simple test. Chemo- sphere, 2000, 40(7): 701~710.
  • 9Sengelov G, Agerso Y, Halling-Sorensen B, et al. Bacterial an tibiotic resistance levels in Danish farmland as a result of treat ment with pig manure slurry. Environment international, 2003 28(7): 587~595.
  • 10Huang J J, Hu H Y, Lu S Q, et al. Monitoring and evaluation of antibiotic-resistant bacteria at a municipal wastewater treatment plant in China. Environment international, 2012, 42: 31~36.

共引文献12

同被引文献40

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部