期刊文献+

基于FAHP法和区间数改进TOPSIS法的盾构隧道下穿建筑物风险评估 被引量:17

Risk Assessment for Shield Tunneling Beneath Buildings Based on Interval Improved TOPSIS Method and FAHP Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为评估盾构隧道施工对邻近建筑物的影响,提出一种基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)和区间数改进优劣解距离(TOPSIS)法相结合的风险评估方法.通过调研建立基于土体性质、建筑物因素、隧道因素、盾构掘进参数等影响因素为主的风险评估体系,基于专家打分利用FAHP判断因素权重.利用传统TOPSIS法,根据因素分级标准选取6个典型样本,确定非等分风险等级判断标准.首次将区间数改进TOPSIS法运用到盾构隧道下穿建筑物的风险评估中,采用区间数描述工程情况.该评估过程均采用量化方式,比传统风险评估方法的准确性更高,受主观因素影响较少,客观性更强.利用该方法对某砌体建筑物进行风险评估,结果与实际情况相符,证明了该方法的有效性,可为类似工程风险评估提供参考. In order to evaluate the impact of shield tunnel construction on adjacent buildings,a method based on the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP)and the interval number improvement technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS)is proposed.A risk assessment system based on soil properties,building factors,tunnel factors,shield tunneling parameters,and other factors is established after investigation.The FAHP is used to determine the weight of factors based on expert scoring.Based on the traditional TOPSIS method,6 typical samples are selected according to the factor grading standard to determine the non-uniform risk rating criteria.For the first time,the interval improved TOPSIS method is applied to the risk assessment of shield tunneling beneath buildings.The engineering situation can be better represented by the interval number.Compared with traditional risk assessment methods,this method is more accurate,less affected by subjective factors,and more objective.The proposed method has been used to evaluate the risk of a certain masonry building,and the result is consistent with the actual situation,which proves its effectiveness of.Thus,the proposed method can provide reference for risk assessment of similar projects.
作者 陈仁朋 王志腾 吴怀娜 刘源 孟凡衍 CHEN Renpeng;WANG Zhiteng;WU Huaina;LIU Yuan;MENG Fanyan(Research Center of Underground Space Advance Technology/Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency of the Ministry of Education/College of Civil Engineering,Hunan University,Changsha 410082,China)
出处 《上海交通大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第12期1710-1719,共10页 Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(51938005) 湖南省创新平台与人才计划-湖湘高层次人才聚集工程-创新团队项目(2019RS1030)。
关键词 盾构隧道 模糊层次分析法 TOPSIS法 风险评估 shield tunnel fuzzy analytic hierarchy process(FAHP) technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution(TOPSIS) risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1原国红,陈剑平,马琳.可拓评判方法在岩体质量分类中的应用[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(9):1539-1544. 被引量:65
  • 2骆建军,张顶立,王梦恕,张成平.地铁施工对邻近建筑物安全风险管理[J].岩土力学,2007,28(7):1477-1482. 被引量:101
  • 3许树柏.实用决策方法-层次分析法原理[M].天津:天津大学出版社,2002.
  • 4姚浩,周红波,蔡来炳,张永福.软土地区土压盾构隧道掘进施工风险模糊评估[J].岩土力学,2007,28(8):1753-1756. 被引量:52
  • 5GB50011-2010建筑抗震设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
  • 6GB50652--2011城市轨道交通地下工程建设风险管理规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
  • 7黄宏伟,陈龙,胡群芳,等.隧道及地下工程令寿命风险管理[M].北京:科学出版社,2010.
  • 8GB5007--2011,建筑地基基础设计规范[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2011.
  • 9Eskesen S D, Tengborg P, Kampmann J, et al. Guide- lines for tunnelling risk management: International Tun- nelling Association, Working Group No. 2 [ J ]. Tunnel- ling and Underground Space Technology, 2004, 19 (3) : 217-237.
  • 10安文杰.基于模糊层次分析法的隧道施工组织方案评价与优化研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2012.

共引文献107

同被引文献388

引证文献17

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部