VDW Reciproc Blue单支锉与传统根管治疗器械在牙髓炎治疗中的疗效对比

Comparison of VDW Reciproc Blue and traditional endodontic instruments in the treatment of pulpitis

目的对比VDW Reciproc Blue单支锉与传统根管治疗器械在牙髓炎治疗中的疗效。方法将60例牙髓炎患者随机分为对照组与实验组,每组30例。对照组采用传统根管预备器械,实验组采用VDW Reciproc Blue单支锉,比较两组的根管预备成型效果(根管流畅度)、根管填充效果、Negm分级(疼痛状态分级)、器械折断率及根管预备时间。结果实验组根管流畅度与根管填充效果均优于对照组(P<0.05);Negm分级轻于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组根管预备时间短于对照组(P<0.01)。结论VDW Reciproc Blue单支锉能够减少患者椅旁时间、减轻术后疼痛和提高治疗效果。

Objective To compare the efficacy of VDW Reciproc Blue and traditional endodontic instruments in the treatment of pulpitis.Methods Sixty patients with pulpitis were randomly divided into the Control Group and the Experimental Group,30 cases in each group.The Control Group was treated with traditional endodontic instruments while the Experimental Group was treated with VDW Reciproc Blue.The results of root canal preparation(root canal fluency),root canal filling effect,Negm grading(pain grading),fracture rate of instruments and root canal preparation time were compared between the two groups.Results The root canal fluency and filling effect of the Experimental Group were superior to those of the Control Group(P<0.05).The Negm grade was lighter than that of the Control Group(P<0.05).The root canal preparation time of the Experimental Group was shorter than that in the Control Group(P<0.01).Conclusion The VDW Reciproc Blue can help reduce the patient’s chair time,mitigate the postoperative pain,and improve the curative effect.