期刊文献+

基于DRGs绩效评价的DIP结算系数测算方法研究 被引量:1

Research on Calculation Method of DIP Settlement Coefficient Based on DRGs Performance Evaluation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的为提高按病种分值付费(DIP)支付方式结算费用的科学性和精细程度,基于疾病诊断相关分组(DRGs)绩效评价研究DIP结算系数的测算方法,提出实施建议。方法选择DRGs绩效评价相关指标,使用成都市29家医院的DRGs绩效评价数据,运用因子分析法和综合指数法,测算各医院的结算系数。结果运用因子分析法和综合指数法测算的结算系数与临床实际相符合。结论基于DRGs绩效评价测算得到的结算系数,综合考虑了各医院的医疗服务质量、效率和安全因素,与其他制度配套使用,有利于促进统筹地区内各医院间的良性竞争和医保基金的高效分配。 Objective improve the scientific level and precision of diagnosis-Intervention Packet(DIP)payment,this study explored the accounting method of DIP settlement coefficient based on DiagnosticRelated Groups(DRGs)performance evaluation,and put forward some implementation suggestions.Method This study selected the relevant indicators of DRGs performance evaluation,used the data of 29hospitals in Chengdu,and calculated the settlement coefficient of each hospital by using factor analysis and comprehensive index method.Result The settlement coefficient calculated by factor analysis and comprehensive index method was consistent with clinical practice.Conclusion The settlement coefficient calculated based on DRGs performance evaluation takes into account the quality,efficiency and safety of medical services of each hospital,and is used in combination with other supporting systems,which is conducive to promoting the benign competition among hospitals within the overall planning area and the efficient allocation of medical insurance funds.
作者 余倩 陈曼莉 YU Qian;CHEN Manli(School of Public Administration,Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,Wuhan 430074,Hubei,China)
出处 《中国卫生信息管理杂志》 2022年第6期944-952,共9页 Chinese Journal of Health Informatics and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目《竞合视角下区域点数法总额预算对县域价值医疗服务体系激励机制研究》(项目编号:72174068)。
关键词 DIP 结算系数 DRGs绩效评价 因子分析法 综合指数法 DIP settlement coefficient DRGs performance evaluation factor analysis comprehensive index method
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献117

  • 1黄靖.按病种分值付费对医院预算管理的影响和对策[J].纳税,2021,15(19):189-190. 被引量:4
  • 2钟茜.基于DRGS的公立医院绩效评价体系的思考与探索[J].财经界,2021(30):183-184. 被引量:2
  • 3贾农,罗薇.DRGs评价体系应用于医院管理运行模式探讨[J].中国医院统计,2019,26(4):289-293. 被引量:8
  • 4龙钊,谢金亮,熊瑶,王晓佳,王秀英,邹俐爱.我国医疗服务按病种定价模型的构建与实证分析[J].中国卫生经济,2015,34(5):55-57. 被引量:5
  • 5Iezzoni L. Risk adjustment for measuring health care outcomes[M]. 3rd ed. Chicago: Health Administration Press, 2003.
  • 6Francis HRF. Case mix use in 25 countries:a migration success but international comparisons failure[J]. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2003, 70: 215-219.
  • 7Bala MV,Zarkin GA. Application of cost effectiveness analysis to multiple products: a practical guide[J]. Am J Manag Care, 2002, 8(3): 211 218.
  • 8Kattcy E. Two decades of casemix. Department of Health and Ageing[EB/OL]. [2011-09-14]. http://www. health. gov. au/ int ernet/main/publishing. nsf/Content.
  • 9Jian WY,Lu M, Cui T, et al. Evaluating performance of local case-mix system by international comparison: a case study in Beijing,China[J]. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 2011, 26(4): 471-481.
  • 10Jian WY,Chan KY, Tang SN, et al. A case study of the coun terpart technical support policy to improve rural health services in Beijing. BMC Health Services Research 2012, 12[EB/OL]. [2012]. http://www. biomedcentral. com/content/pdf/1472-6963-12-482. pdf.

共引文献439

同被引文献14

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部