期刊文献+

明暗之间:诺丁斯关怀伦理的他者性意蕴--以列维纳斯他者性观点为坐标的比较与分析 被引量:3

Between the Light and Shade:Otherness in Nel Noddings’ Caring Ethics--Comparison and Analysis Based on Levinas’ Ethics of the Other
原文传递
导出
摘要 诺丁斯曾指出其关怀伦理与列维纳斯的他者伦理之间具有共通之处。细查其关怀伦理,不仅可以窥见其中他者性思想的踪迹,而且可以发现其在关键概念与重要命题上似是而非的他者性特征。于是,诺丁斯关怀伦理中他者性的存在状态则成为一个晦暗不明的问题。以列维纳斯的他者性为思想坐标,从他者、自我与他者-自我三个维度上考察诺丁斯关怀伦理的有关论述,可以发现其中他者性线索时明时暗,并呈现出一种有限度的、隐微的他者性特征,形成了关怀伦理独具风格的他者性意蕴。探微关怀伦理的他者性意蕴,是对作为关怀伦理内核的他者性的发现与重申,不仅有助于深刻理解关怀伦理的内在精神,而且有利于以他者性为视角提出并回应教育中的关怀问题。 Nel Noddings once pointed out that her caring ethics has something in common with Levinas’ ethics of the other.Looking through her caring ethics,it not only appears the traits of otherness,but also shows the specious characteristics of otherness on key concepts and important propositions.Therefore,the existential state of otherness in Noddings’ caring ethics becomes a murky issue.Taking Levinas’ theory as the ideological coordinate,this paper investigates the discussion on Noddings’ caring ethics from the three dimensions of ego,the other and other-ego.It is found that the clues of otherness are turning dim and bright now and then in Noddings’ discourse,showing a limited and vague feature of otherness,forming the unique connotation of otherness in caring ethics.By exploring the otherness of the caring ethics,we can grasp the theory accurately.It is also conducive to ask and answer the questions of caring in education from a perspective of otherness.
作者 叶雅萱 张姜坤 YE Yaxuan;ZHANG Jiangkun(Faculty of Education,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875)
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第11期104-112,共9页 International and Comparative Education
基金 中国博士后科学基金面上项目“具身思维下学校道德教育变革研究”(项目编号:2021M690429)。
关键词 诺丁斯 关怀伦理 列维纳斯 他者伦理 他者性 Nel Noddings caring ethics Levinas the ethics of the other otherness
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献17

  • 1顾红亮.另一种主体性——列维纳斯的我他之辨与伦理学[J].天津社会科学,2005(4):27-30. 被引量:21
  • 2顾红亮.责任与他者——列维纳斯的责任观[J].社会科学研究,2006(1):37-40. 被引量:48
  • 3[德]马丁·布伯.《论犹太教》,刘杰等译,山东大学出版社,2002年.
  • 4[德]马丁·布伯.《我与你》,陈维纲译,生活·读书·新知三联书店2002年版,第40页.
  • 5Emmanuel Levinas, "On Bulxr,"' in Peter Atterton, Matthew Ca- larco and Maurice Friednmn, Linas and Buber: Dialogue and difference, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 2004, p. 32.
  • 6Emmanuel Levinas, Outside the Subject, London, The Athlone Press, 1993, pp.43 -44,43.
  • 7Emmanuel Levinas, "Martin Buber and the Theory of Knowl- edge," In S. Hand( ed. ), The Levinas Reader, Oxford, Basil Black- well, 1989, p. 72.
  • 8Emmanuel Levinas, "Martin Buber and the Theory of Knowl- edge," In S. Hand (ed.), The Levinas Reader, Oxford, Basil Black- we11,1989, pp. 67 -68.
  • 9Ephraim Meir, "Buber' s and Levinas' s Attitudes toward Ju- daism," in Peter Atterton, Matthew Calarco and Maurice Friedman, Levinas and Buber : Dialogue and difference, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 2004, p. 139.
  • 10Maurice Friedman, "Martin Buber and Emmanuel Levinas: An Ethical Query," in Peter Atterton, Matthew Calarco and Maurice Friedman, Levinas and Buber : Dialogue and difference, Pittsburgh, Duquesne University Press, 2004, p. 119.

共引文献40

同被引文献36

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部