回归原典:毛奇龄《孝经》学的学术史意义

Returning to Original Classics:Mao Qiling’s Idea on The Classic on Filial Piety Considered from Academic Historical Significance

《孝经刊误》和《孝经定本》分别是朱熹和吴澄改易《孝经》文本的著作;《孝经问》是毛奇龄反对改易《孝经》的著作。本文从《孝经》成书和章次章名、今古文、分经传和改易等方面论述了朱熹、吴澄和毛奇龄三人所论《孝经》学观点的异同,并从经学思路、文本来源等角度分析了三者不同的原因,进而总结了毛奇龄以回归原典为旨归的《孝经》学的学术史意义。

The Corrigenda to The Classic on Filial Piety(Xiào Jīng Kān Wùin Chinese pinyin.The same below)and The Classic on Filial Piety in Revision(Xiào Jīng Dìng Běn)by Zhu Xi and Wu Cheng respectively are re-edited from The Classic on Filial Piety(Xiào Jīng).The Questionary to The Classic on Filial Piety(Xiào Jīng Wèn)is the work by Mao Qiling who objects to any changes to the content of The Classic on Filial Piety(Xiào Jīng).The analysis includes the following aspects:their same and different views on the issues concerning the completion,chapters,modern and ancient texts,amendments and revisions of The Classic on Filial Piety;What made them think differently analyzed from their thoughts on Confucian Classics and the sources of the texts;the connection and succession of The Corrigenda to The Classic on Filial Piety and The Classic on Filial Piety in Revision.The last concerns Mao Qiling’s idea that sticks to The Classics on Filial Piety(Xiào Jīng)in original in academic historical significance.