摘要
本文梳理了黄公望《富春山居图》卷摹本的一系列“火前本”,逐一分析了它们的产生经过并给予重新认识,如沈周的《临黄公望富春山居图》卷系临本而不是董其昌所说的“背临”;清初张宏《临黄公望富春山居图》卷系假冒“火前本”;王翚早中期的《临黄公望富春山居图》卷,借自唐宇昭的油素本,具有“火前本”的因素。尤其是明摹本与董其昌的关系,作者通过多方面论证,认为“明摹本”极可能系王时敏早年之笔,根据清初吴其贞修复黄公望《剩山图》卷的图像判断,其修复是以“明摹本”为依据的。
This thesis reviews the works copied after Huang Gongwang’s panorama of Dwelling in The Fuchun Mountains’(FùChūn Shān JūTúin Chinese pinyin.The same below)in hand scroll(before ruined in fire)and reaches the further identification to them by the process of their being completed each:Shen Zhou’s copy of Dwelling in The Fuchun Mountains’is painted after the original work in the way called Lin Ben(Lín Běn)not by his memory in the way called Bei Lin(Bèi Lín)as Dong Qichang insists.Zhang Hong’s copy of Dwelling in Fuchun Mountains’of the early Qing dynasty is faked not copied from the original.Wang Hui’s earlier copy of Dwelling in The Fuchun Mountains’is of the same feature as the original,but it is actually based on Tang Yuzhao’s copied work in fine white silk called Yousu Ben(YóusùBěn)on the same theme.That the relationship between Dong Qichang and the copies of the Ming dynasty(’Ming Copy’for short,Míng MóBěn)is combined with the relevant arguments in many aspects suggests that the’Ming Copy’is probably the work by Wang Shimin in his early years.The image of’Remnant Mountain’(Shèng Shān Tú)restored by Wu Qizhen of the early Qing dynasty is based on the’Ming copy’.
出处
《故宫博物院院刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第11期46-58,143,144,共15页
Palace Museum Journal
关键词
沈周本
张宏本
明摹本
董其昌
王时敏
吴其贞修复《剩山图》
Shen Zhou’s copy after’Dwelling in The Fuchun Mountains’
Zhang Hong’s copy after’Dwelling in The Fuchun Mountains’
the copies after the original’Dwelling in The Fuchun Mountains’of the Ming dynasty
Dong Qichang
Wang Shimin
the restored image of’Remnant Mountain’(Shèng Shān Tú)by Wu Qizhen