兽医病理学检测领域CNAS认可能力范围表述浅析

Discussion on the Scope Expression of CNAS Laboratory Accreditation in Veterinary Pathology Testing Field

现阶段,由于兽医病理学检测认可能力范围表述存在一定差异,中国合格评定国家认可委员会(China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment,CNAS)认可实验室在兽医病理学检测领域扩项申报过程及评审员评审过程中出现了不规范、不统一的情况,使很多从事实验动物病理学检测及科研工作的实验室无法获得相关资质。本文通过对兽医病理学检测领域CNAS认可能力范围表述存在问题进行分析,对比英国、美国、加拿大、新西兰、新加坡等国外实验室兽医病理学能力范围表述,以及CNAS和其他ISO/IEC 17025认可机构的医学病理学实验室检测能力范围表述,并结合我国兽医病理学实验室认可实践情况,提出了针对兽医病理学检测领域能力范围表述的建议,期望进一步统一和规范我国兽医病理学检测领域的认可能力范围表述,以提升我国认可制度的规范性。

At present,due to some differences in the scope expression of veterinary pathology testing accreditation ability,the laboratory accreditation of China National Accreditation Service for Conformity Assessment(CNAS)is not standardized and uniform in the process of application of expanded items in the field of veterinary pathology testing and the process of assessors’evaluation,which makes many laboratories engaged in laboratory animal pathology testing and scientific research fail to obtain relevant qualifications.This article discussed the problems of scope expression in the field of CNAS veterinary pathology accreditation,and compared the expression with other veterinary pathology laboratories in other countries including the United Kingdom,the United States,Canada,New Zealand,and Singapore.The scope expression in medical pathology laboratories accredited by CNAS and some other ISO/IEC 17025accreditation organizations were also compared.Combined with the accreditation practice of veterinary pathology laboratories in China,this paper put forward some suggestions on the scope expression in veterinary pathology testing field,so as to further unify and standardize the scope expression in veterinary pathology testing field in China,and improve the standardization of accreditation system in China.