期刊文献+

基于FAHP的汽车造型创意设计评审决策研究

Research on Evaluation and Optimization of Automobile Creative Design Scheme Based on FAHP
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对影响汽车造型创意设计评审的要素进行了研究,为汽车创意设计方案的选择决策提供量化依据。方法基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP),组织相关干系人成立创意设计方案评价专家小组,通过分析用户对客观事物审美、造型美学感知,工程约束和品牌独特性,识别出影响方案评审的关键要素,建立评价层次结构模型,通过专家评审打分进行权重计算和排序的定量研究。结论利用FAHP对创意设计方案进行评审,能够有效地避免因为主观判断的随机性较强引发的客观判断错误的问题,为方案的评审提供量化选择的可能性,进一步指导设计方案的后续开发,确保汽车产品外观的市场竞争优势。 The factors affecting the evaluation of automobile creative design are studied to provide quantitative basis for the selection and decision taking for automobile creative design.Based on fuzzy analytic Hierarchy Process(FAHP),stakeholders were organized to establish an expert group for evaluation of creative design themes,to identify the key factors by analyzing users'perception of aesthetic and modeling aesthetics of objective things,engineering constraints and brand images.Then to establish the evaluation hierarchy model,and study the weight calculation and ranking quantitatively through the expert evaluation score.By FAHP to evaluate creative design schemes can effectively solve the problem that the objective weight lost due to the strong randomness of subjective weight,provide the possibility of quantitative selection for design review,further guide the subsequent development of design,and ensure the market competitive advantage of automobile product appearance.
作者 李彦龙 盘昌星 Li Yan-long;Pan Chang-xing(Tongji University,Shanghai 201804,China)
机构地区 同济大学
出处 《内燃机与配件》 2022年第22期111-113,共3页 Internal Combustion Engine & Parts
关键词 汽车造型创意设计 项目管理 风险管理 FAHP Car styling Project management Risk management FAHP
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献44

  • 1周勤业,王啸.美国内部控制信息披露的发展及其借鉴[J].会计研究,2005(2):24-31. 被引量:185
  • 2李海云,严华刚,李振明.事件相关电位特征提取方法研究[J].医疗卫生装备,2005,26(8):22-24. 被引量:3
  • 3MORENO A M, SEFFAH A, CAPILLA R, et al. HCI prac- tices for building usable software[J]. Computer, 2013,46 (4) : 100-102.
  • 4HUANG Y, CHEN C, WANG I C, et al. A product configu- ration analysis method for emotional design using a personal construct theory[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergo- nomics, 2014,44 (1) .. 120-130.
  • 5CHEN C, SATO K, LEE K. Editorial.. human-centered prod- uct design and development[J]. Advanced Engineering Infor- maticsHuman-Centered Product Design and Development, 2009,23(2) : 140-141.
  • 6LIP H, YANG L N. Application of improved analytic hierar- chy process in industrial design evaluating for product design [J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2012,490-495 : 2022-2026.
  • 7CHEN Y, LIU Y, LIU T, et al. Comprehensive evaluation for product quality generalized based on fuzzy analytic hierar- chy process[C]//Proceedings of the 2nd International Con- frence on Intelligent Compution Technology and Automation. Washington, D. C. , USA IEEE, 2009,2 .. 672-675.
  • 8LEE C, LEE H, SEOL H, et al. Evaluation of new service concepts using rough set theory and group analytic hierarchy process[J]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2012, 39(3):3404-3412.
  • 9HSIAO S W, HSU C F, LEE Y T. An online affordance eval- uation model for product design[J]. Design Studies, 2012,33 (2):126-159.
  • 10Mohammad Rajabalinejad,Christos Spitas.Incorporating uncertainty into the design management process[].Design Management Journal.2011

共引文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部