期刊文献+

面向自动驾驶汽车的交通标线使用状况评估方法 被引量:1

Road Markings Condition Assessment Method for Intelligent Vehicles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着自动驾驶技术的不断进步和普及,道路上将会出现越来越多具有自动驾驶技术的汽车,交通标线的服务对象将逐渐从驾驶员向自动驾驶汽车过渡。现有的交通标线使用状况评估方法不但需要耗费大量的人力去巡查、测量和评估,而且评估指标也是基于生物视觉研究而得,不符合基于机器视觉的自动驾驶汽车的特点;针对上述的问题,文中提出了一种面向自动驾驶汽车的交通标线使用状况评估方法。首先,基于自动驾驶汽车的特性,运用查阅文献、类比推理和逻辑推理等方法初步确定峰值信噪比(PSNR)作为评估指标;其次,为了快速且准确地获取峰值信噪比,提出了基于图像修复的峰值信噪比的计算方法,该方法先利用基于条件生成对抗网络的DeblurGAN模型在图像层面复原破损的交通标线,进而利用破损和复原后的交通标线图像计算出峰值信噪比,同时,文中提出了一种可以真实地合成破损的交通标线图像的数据增强方法去提高图像修复模型的性能。然后,以AlexNet网络为基准模型设计对照实验去研究峰值信噪比与交通标线的识别准确率的关系;最后,将研究成果应用到实际的交通标线使用状况的评估工作中,并与现行规范的评估方法比较。实验结果表明:与基于人工修复图像的峰值信噪比的计算方法对比,文中所提的方法得到的平均峰值信噪比只相差约2.24%,但获取速度却提高了约418倍;峰值信噪比影响交通标线的识别准确率,当平均PSNR相差约43.66%时,平均识别准确率相差了约36.27%,峰值信噪比可以衡量交通标线的使用状况;文中所提出的评估方法使工作效率约提高了6.5倍且耗费更少的人力,也更符合自动驾驶汽车的特点,但规范中的评估方法更加详尽。 With the continuous advancement and popularization of autonomous driving technology,more and more vehicles with autonomous driving technology will appear on the road,and the service objects of road markings will gradually transition from drivers to autonomous vehicles.On the one hand,the method of road markings condition assessment requires a lot of manpower to inspect,measure and evaluate;on the other hand,the evaluation index is based on biological vision research,which does not conform to the characteristics of automatic driving vehicles based on machine vision.To solve the above problems,this paper proposed a method of road markings condition assessment for autonomous vehicles.First,PSNR(peak signal-to-noise ratio)was initially determined as the evaluation index by means of literature review,analogical reasoning and logical reasoning.Secondly,to quickly obtain PSNR,this paper proposes a calculation method of the PSNR based on image inpainting,which utilizes the Deblur‐GAN model restores the damaged road markings at the image level,and then uses the damaged and restored road markings images to calculate the PSNR.In addition,this paper proposed a data augmentation method that can realis-tically synthesize damaged road markings images to improve the performance of image inpainting models.Then,the AlexNet network was used as the benchmark model to design experiments to study the relationship between the PSNR and the recognition accuracy of road markings.The experimental results show that,compared with the calculation method of the PSNR based on the artificially restored image,the average PSNR obtained by the method pro‐posed in this paper only differs by about 2.24%,but the acquisition speed is increased by about 418 times;when the average PSNR differs by about 43.66%,the average recognition accuracy differs by about 36.27%.Therefore,the PSNR can measure the use of road markings.Compared with the evaluation method of the current standard,the evaluation method proposed in this paper improves the work efficiency by about 6.5 times and consumes less manpower.And it is more in line with the characteristics of self-driving cars,but the evaluation methods are more detailed in the specification.
作者 符锌砂 彭锦辉 曾彦杰 赵赛先 李百建 FU Xinsha;PENG Jinhui;ZENG Yanjie;ZHAO Saixian;LI Baijian(School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,South China University of Technology,Guangzhou 510640,Guangdong,China;Guangdong Provincial Transportation Planning and Research Center,Guangzhou 510199,Guangdong,China;Guangdong Communication Planning&Design Institute Group Co.Ltd,Guangzhou 510627,Guangdong,China)
出处 《华南理工大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第11期1-13,共13页 Journal of South China University of Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51778242,51978283)。
关键词 自动驾驶汽车 交通标线 使用状况 评估方法 峰值信噪比 识别准确率 intelligent vehicles road markings working condition assessment method PSNR recognition accuracy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献29

  • 1邹伦开,周娅,王宏远.一种改进的视频序列质量合并算法[J].计算机工程与应用,2006,42(35):68-69. 被引量:1
  • 2Daly S J. The visible difference predictor:an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity [ M]//Watson A B. Digital hnages and Human Vision. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1993 : 179-206.
  • 3Heeger D J ,Teo P C. A model of perceptual image fidelity [ C ] // Proceedings of International Conference on Image Processing. Washington D C : IEEE, 1995 : 343- 345.
  • 4Ichigaya A, Nishida Y, Nakasu E. Nonreference method for estimating PSNR of MPEG-2 coded video by using DCT coefficients and picture energy [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 2008,18(6) :817-818.
  • 5Christian J, Daniele M, Giovanni L, et al. Quality assessment of motion rendition in video coding [ J ]. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 1999,9 (5) :766-782.
  • 6Huynh-Thu Q, Ghanbari M. Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assessment [ J]. Electronics Letters, 2008,44( 13 ) :800-801.
  • 7Jones M J, Rehg J M. Statistical color models with application to skin detection [ C] //Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Fort Collins : IEEE, 1999:274-280.
  • 8Miao J, Yin B, Wang K, et al. A hierarchical multiscale and muhiangle system for human face detection in a complex background using gravity-center template [ J].Pattern Recognition, 1999,32 (7) : 1237-1248.
  • 9Kim K I, Kim J H ,Jung K. Face recognition using support vector machines with local correlation kernels [ J ]. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence ,2002,16( 1 ) :97-111.
  • 10Viola P,Jones M. Rapid object detection using a boosted cascade of simple features [C]// Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Kauai : IEEE, 2001 : 511 - 518.

共引文献23

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部