期刊文献+

南极保护区制度会否创设新的历史性权利--基于对南极领土主权问题的思考

Could the System of Antarctic Protected Areas Create New Historic Rights--A Perspective from the Issue of Territorial Sovereignty in Antarctica
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在南极条约体系内,那些有约束力的措施反复申明南极领土主权问题的原则和规则,以此保护有关国家所坚称的历史性权利。作为对全球气候变化议题的回应,根据《马德里议定书》及其附件五及有关指南建立起来的南极保护区制度变得愈加重要,但南极领土主权声索国和准声索国争相指定南极保护区的行为,凸显这一制度的根本性缺陷及其可能创设的新的历史性权利。面对如此复杂情势,中国需酌情提出南极保护区制度的改革方案,限制或削弱其可能创设的历史性权利对南极领土主权问题的复加性影响,切实保障中国在这一制度下的权利和利益。 Within the Antarctic Treaty System,the binding measures has frequently confirmed the principles and rules for the critical issues of territorial sovereignty in Antarctica so as to protect the historic rights asserted by various countries.Having been a response to global climate change,the legal system of the Antarctic Protected Areas established under the Madrid Protocol and its annex V has become increasingly important.However,the claiming and quasi-claiming countries have been designating the Antarctic Protected Areas.This situation highlights the fundamental problems of this system and the possibility of creating new historic rights.Facing such a complicated situation,China can propose a reform to this legal system of the Antarctic Protected Areas.The reform can be designed to weaken and limit the possibility of creating the historic rights on the issue of territorial sovereignty in Antarctica and manage its negative impacts so as to practically protect China’s own rights and interests under this system.
作者 李雪平 LI Xueping(Wuhan University,Wuhan430072,China)
出处 《太平洋学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第10期49-60,共12页 Pacific Journal
基金 国家社科基金项目“推动构建新型国际关系和人类命运共同体的国际法规范体系建设研究”(21AZD092) 中国极地科学战略基金项目“国际南极保护区制度对南极领土主权问题的影响研究”(JDB20210208)的阶段性研究成果。
关键词 南极保护区制度 南极领土主权 南极条约体系 历史性权利 制度效用 system of Antarctic Protected Areas territorial sovereignty in Antarctica Antarctic Treaty System historic rights institutional effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献33

  • 1曾令良.现代国际法的人本化发展趋势[J].中国社会科学,2007(1):89-103. 被引量:167
  • 2McHarg, A. ,B. Barton, A. Bradbrook, L. Godden. Property and the Law in Energy and Natural Resources[M]. London: Oxford University Press, 2010.
  • 3Craven, M. C. R. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights =A Perspective on Its Development [M]. Oxford : Clarendon Press, 1995.
  • 4Hossain, K. (eds.). Legal Aspects of a New International Economic Order[M]. London= Frances Printer,1980.
  • 5Wilde, T. , S. Dow. Treaties and regulatory risk in infrastructure investment[J]. Journal of World Trade, 2000, (1).
  • 6WTO. China-Measures Related to the Exportation of Various Raw Materials (WT/DS394/AB/R,WT/DS395/AB/R and WT/DS398/AB/R)[EB/OL]. http.//www, wto. org/english/tratop_e/dispu e/394 395 398abr e. pdf,2013-08-12.
  • 7Cordonier Segger, M. C. , A. Khaan. Sustainable Development Law-Principles, Practices, Prospects [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 8Duruigho, E. Permanent sovereignty and peoples' ownership of natural resources in international law[J]. George Washing- ton International Law Review ,2006, (38).
  • 9Schrijver, N. Sovereignty Over Natural Resources, Balancing Rights and Duties [M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press, 1997.
  • 10Dolzer,R. Permanent sovereignty over natural resources and economic decolonization[J]. Human Rights Law Journal, 1986,(7).

共引文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部