期刊文献+

中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值联合患病年龄在双表型肝细胞癌诊断中的应用价值 被引量:2

Application value of neutrophil lymphocyte ratio combined with age in the diagnosis of dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值联合患病年龄在同时期双表型肝细胞癌(DPHCC)患者与非双表型肝细胞癌(非DPHCC)患者中临床诊断价值,以寻求快捷有效的鉴别诊断生物标志物。方法回顾性分析2017年5月至2020年5月南通大学附属医院行根治性肝癌切除术的患者164例,其中DPHCC共29例(17.7%),非DPHCC共135例(82.3%)。统计以上患者临床病历资料,包括患者基本信息、临床症状体征、传染病史、术前1 d实验室化验指标、术后病理报告等相关资料,术后随访时间18个月,资料完整。通过分析同时期DPHCC患者与非DPHCC患者的临床病历资料,以寻找快捷有效的鉴别诊断指标物,并探讨提示DPHCC患者预后不良的指标。结果单因素方差分析显示,DPHCC和非DPHCC组患者患病年龄[(53.9±10.0)与(62.6±9.1)岁]、甲胎蛋白[143(4.8~984.8)与9.9(2.8~71.3)μg/L]、中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(3.650±1.924与2.220±1.486)、中性粒细胞数、淋巴细胞数、脉管浸润率、TNM分期、中国肝癌分期(CNLC)、Child分级和日本综合分期评分(JIS)等方面差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。多因素logistic回归分析确定患病年龄(OR值:0.967,95%CI:0.860~0.957)和NLR(OR值:1.564,95%CI:1.205~2.029)为DPHCC鉴别诊断的危险因素。利用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价后发现NLR的诊断效能最大,最佳截断值为2.586。其联合患病年龄可提高鉴别诊断能效性,最大的诊断效能为曲线下面积(AUC)=0.836,灵敏度为89.66%,特异度为65.93%。结论NLR联合患病年龄对预测DPHCC具有一定的可行性,或可成为鉴别DPHCC与非DPHCC患者的有效指标。 Objective This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical medical records of patients with dual phenotypic liver cancer(DPHCC)and those(non-DPHCC)in the same period to seek quick and effective biomarkers for differential diagnosis.Methods A retrospective study was conducted on 164 patients who underwent radical hepatocellular carcinoma resection at Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University from May 2017 to May 2020,including 29 patients with DPHCC,accounting for 17.7%(age:53.9±10.0).There were 135 non-DPHCC patients,accounting for 82.3%(age,62.6±9.1).The clinical records of the above patients were collected,including the basic information of the patients,clinical symptoms and signs,history of infection,laboratory test indexes one day before surgery,postoperative pathological report and other relevant data,The follow-up time was 18 months and the data were complete.By analyzing the clinical data of DPHCC patients and non-DPHCC patients in the same period,to find quick and effective differential diagnostic indicators,and to explore the indicators indicating poor prognosis of DPHCC patients.Results One-way ANOVA showed significant differences in age,AFP[143(4.8-984.8)vs 9.9(2.8-71.3)μg/L],NLR(3.650±1.924 vs 2.220±1.486),neutrophil count,lymphocyte count,vascular infiltration rate,TNM stage,Chinese Hepatocellular carcinoma Staging(CNLC),Child grade,and Japanese General Staging Score(JIS)(P<0.05).Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age(OR score:0.967,95%CI:0.860-0.957)and NLR(OR score:1.564,95%CI:1.205-2.029)as independent risk factors for DPHCC differential diagnosis.The receiver operating characteristic(ROC)curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficiency of NLR,and the best cut-off value was 2.586.The combination of age at onset improved the efficiency of differential diagnosis.When reaching the maximum diagnostic efficiency,the area under curve(AUC)was 0.836,the sensitivity was 89.66%,and the specificity was 65.93%.Conclusion NLR combined with the age of disease has certain feasibility in predicting DPHCC and may be an effective index to distinguish DPHCC from non-DPHCC patients.
作者 王开东 陆冠一 刁先坪 王雷 周鹏成 马峰 范向军 Wang Kaidong;Lu Guanyi;Diao Xianping;Wang Lei;Zhou Pengcheng;Ma Feng;Fan Xiangjun(Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University,Nantong 226001;Southeast University Medical College,Nanjing 210000;Qidong People′s Hospital,Nantong 226001)
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第46期3686-3692,共7页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 肝肿瘤 双表型肝细胞癌 中性粒与淋巴细胞比值 鉴别诊断 Liver neoplasms Dual-phenotype hepatocellular carcinoma Neutrophil and lymphocyte ratio Differential diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献74

  • 1Ying Zhang, Jian Deng, Jun Feng, Feng Wu.Enhancement of antitumor vaccine in ablated hepatocellular carcinoma by high-intensity focused ultrasound[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2010,16(28):3584-3591. 被引量:12
  • 2吴孟超.应重视小肝癌的诊断与治疗[J].中华医学杂志,2007,87(30):2089-2091. 被引量:11
  • 3应越英. 肝细胞肝癌的病理学[M]//汤钊猷.原发性肝癌. 上海:科学技术出版社, 1981:115-46.
  • 4Koh C, Zhao X, Samala N, et al. AASLD clinical practice guide-lines: a critical review of scientific evidence and evolving recommendations[J]. Hepatology, 2013, 58(6): 2142-2152.
  • 5William H, Ralph H, Timothy H, et al. Surgical pathology dissection: an illustrated guidej M]. New York: Springer, 2003: 7-9.
  • 6Bass BP, Engel KB, Gremk SR, et al. A review of preanalytical factors affecting molecular, protein, and morphological analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue: how well do you know your FFPE specimen[J]? Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2014, iasu i). 1520-1530.
  • 7Lu XY, Xi T, Lau WY, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma expressing cholangiocyte phenotype is a novel subtype with highly aggressive behavior[J]. Ann Surg Oncol, 2011, 18(8): 2210-2217.
  • 8Cai SW, Yang SZ, GaoJ, et al. Prognostic significance of mast cell count following curative resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma[J]. Surgery, 2011, 149(4): 576-584.
  • 9Nakanuma Y, Curado MP, Franceschi S, et al. Intrahepatic cholangiocareinoma[M]/ /Bosman FT, Carneire F, Hruban RH, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC Press, 2010: 217-227.
  • 10Cong WM, Wu Me. Small hepatocellular carcinoma: current and future approaches[J]. Hepatol Int, 20 l3, 7 (3): 805-812.

共引文献507

同被引文献25

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部