摘要
为解决盲孔渗碳的难题,分析比较了常规气体渗碳及真空低压渗碳工艺对20CrMo钢盲孔的渗碳能力。结果表明,采用真空低压渗碳工艺对盲孔内部的渗碳能力远高于常规气体渗碳工艺;且盲孔尺寸越小,真空度越高,渗碳能力就越好。常规气体渗碳及真空低压渗碳的气体状态不同,是引起两种工艺对盲孔内部渗碳能力不同的主要原因。
To solve the problem of blind hole carbonization,the carburizing capacity of conventional gas carburizing and vacuum low-pressure carburizing to the blind holes of 20 CrMo steel were analyzed and compared.The results show that the carburizing capacity of vacuum low-pressure carburizing to the blind hole is much higher than that of the conventional gas carburizing,and the smaller the size of the blind hole,the higher the vacuum,the better the carburizing capacity is.The different gas states of the conventional gas carburizing and vacuum low-pressure carburizing are the main reasons for the different carburizing capacity of the two processes for blind hole inner surface.
作者
苏阳
史有森
张志冲
王琴
王美乾
茅君
Su Yang;Shi Yousen;Zhang Zhichong;Wang Qin;Wang Meiqian;Mao Jun(Jiangsu Fengdong Thermal Technology Co.,Ltd.,Yancheng Jiangsu 224100,China)
出处
《金属热处理》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2022年第11期152-155,共4页
Heat Treatment of Metals
基金
国家重点研发计划(2018YFB2001903)。
关键词
20CRMO钢
盲孔
常规气体渗碳
真空低压渗碳
20CrMo steel
blind hole
conventional gas carburizing
vacuum low-pressure carburizing