期刊文献+

不同胎龄和出生体重新生儿左右心室Tei指数比较

Comparison of left and right ventricular Tei indexes in newborns of different gestational age and birth weight
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较不同胎龄和出生体重新生儿左右心室Tei指数及其参考范围。方法选择徐州市中心医院新生儿重症监护病房2019年2月至2021年6月收治、无需正压通气、无需使用血管活性药物的新生儿进行前瞻性研究, 均在出生>24 h且7 d内测量并计算Tei指数, 部分新生儿在第1次测量1~2周后复查。根据胎龄分为<32周组、32~36周组、≥37周组, 根据出生体重分为<1 500 g组、1 500~2 499 g组、≥2 500 g组, 根据测量日龄分为1~7 d组、>7 d组。应用SPSS 20.0统计软件, 采用t检验、单因素方差分析及相关性分析, 比较不同性别、胎龄、出生体重、日龄新生儿左右心室Tei指数, 分析日龄1~7 d新生儿Tei指数参考范围。结果最终纳入128例。<32周42例、32~36周43例、≥37周43例;<1 500 g 42例、1 500~2 499 g 42例、≥2 500 g 44例;早产儿>7 d复查63例, 足月儿>7 d复查31例。日龄1~7 d时, ≥37周组左右心室Tei指数小于32~36周组和<32周组(左心室:0.382±0.069比0.431±0.069、0.439±0.060, 右心室:0.373±0.038比0.431±0.035、0.452±0.064), 32~36周组右心室Tei指数小于<32周组, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);32~36周组与<32周组左心室Tei指数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。出生体重≥2 500 g组左右心室Tei指数小于1 500~2 499 g组和<1 500 g组(左心室:0.385±0.069比0.434±0.067、0.434±0.064, 右心室:0.376±0.039比0.431±0.043、0.450±0.061), 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);1 500~2 499 g组与<1 500 g组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。早产儿和足月儿>7 d时左右心室Tei指数与1~7 d比较, 差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。日龄1~7 d时新生儿Tei指数参考范围均随胎龄和出生体重的增加而逐渐降低。结论足月儿和出生体重≥2 500 g新生儿左右心室Tei指数明显小于早产儿和低出生体重儿;日龄1~7 d时新生儿左右心室Tei指数参考范围与胎龄和出生体重均成负相关。 Objective To compare left and right ventricular Tei indexes and to determine the reference range in newborns of different gestational age(GA)and birth weight(BW).Methods From February 2019 to June 2021,newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of our hospital were enrolled.Tei indexes were measured and calculated during 24 h~7 d after birth and reexamined 1~2 weeks later in some of the newborns.The newborns were assigned into<32 w group,32~36 w group and≥37 w group according to their GA,<1500 g group,1500~2499 g group and≥2500 g group according to their BW,and early newborn group(1~7 d)and late newborn group(>7 d)according to their age of evaluation.The data were analyzed using t test,one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA)and correlation analysis with SPSS 20.0 statistical software.Results A total of 128 cases were included.42 cases in<32 w group,43 in 32~36 w group and 43 in≥37 w group.42 cases in<1500 g group,42 in 1500~2499 g group and 44 in≥2500 g group.Tei indexes were reexamined after 7 d of age in 63 preterm infants and in 31 full-term infants.The left and right ventricular Tei indexes of the≥37 w group were less than the 32~36 w group and the<32 w group in early newborns(left ventricular:0.382±0.069 vs.0.431±0.069 and 0.439±0.060,right ventricular:0.373±0.038 vs.0.431±0.035 and 0.452±0.064);the right ventricular Tei index of the 32~36 w group was significantly less than the<32 w group(P<0.05).No significant differences existed in the left ventricular Tei index between the 32~36 w group and the<32 w group(P>0.05).The left and right ventricular Tei indexes of the≥2500 g group were significantly less than the 1500~2499 g group and the<1500 g group(left ventricular:0.385±0.069 vs.0.434±0.067 and 0.434±0.064,right ventricular:0.376±0.039 vs.0.431±0.043 and 0.450±0.061)(P<0.05).No significant differences existed between the 1500~2499 g group and the<1500 g group(P>0.05).No significant differences existed in the left and right ventricular Tei indexes between the late newborn group and early newborn group(P>0.05).For early newborns(1~7 d of age),the reference range of Tei index gradually decreased along with the increase of GA and BW.Conclusions The left and right ventricular Tei indexes of full-term infants and infants with BW≥2500 g are less than preterm and low birth weight infants.The reference range of Tei index in early newborns shows negative correlation with GA and BW.
作者 雷红林 徐杜娟 杨波 金宝 李丽 任漪 宋晓彤 王乐瑶 高翔羽 Lei Honglin;Xu Dujuan;Yang Bo;Jin Bao;Li Li;Ren Yi;Song Xiaotong;Wang Leyao;Gao Xiangyu(Department of Neonatology,Xuzhou Central Hospital(the Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University),Xuzhou 221009,China;Department of Ultrasonography,Xuzhou Central Hospital(the Xuzhou Clinical College of Xuzhou Medical University),Xuzhou 221009,China)
出处 《中华新生儿科杂志(中英文)》 CAS 2022年第6期488-493,共6页 Chinese Journal of Neonatology
基金 江苏省卫生健康委科研项目(Z2020060) 江苏省妇幼健康科研项目(F201752) 徐州市科技局重点研发计划(KC18188)。
关键词 心室功能 婴儿 新生 参考值 胎龄 出生体重 Ventricular function Infant,newborn Reference values Gestational age Birth weight
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1章鸣,周启昌,彭清海,范萍.组织多普勒成像评价正常胎儿左、右室Tei指数的研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(2):136-138. 被引量:21
  • 2于蕾,任卫东,李玉宏,郑浩,张东旭,马春燕.Tei指数评价原发性高血压患者左室收缩及舒张功能的临床研究[J].中国超声医学杂志,2005,21(7):506-508. 被引量:28
  • 3Vonk MC, Sander MH, van den Hoogen FH, et a|. Right ven- tricle Tei-index: a tool to increase the accuracy o{ non-invasive detection of pulmonary arterial hypertension in connective tissue diseases. Eur J Echocardiogr, 2007, 8 (5) : 317-321.
  • 4Tei C. New noninvasive index for combined systolic and diastolic ventricular function. J Cardial, 1995, 26 (2): 135-136.
  • 5Ohawi H, Gendi S, Mallula K, et al. Fetal left and right ventri- cle myocardial performance index: defining normal values for the second and third trimesters single tertiary center experience. Pediatr Cardiol, 2013, 34 (8) : 1808-1815.
  • 6Friedman D, Buyon J, Kirn M, et al. Fetal cardiac function as- sessed by Doppler myocardial performance index (Tei index). UItrasound Obstet Gyneeol, 2003, 21 (1): 33-36.
  • 7Tsutsumi T, Ishii M, Eto G, et al. Serial evaluation for myo- cardial performance in fetuses and neonates using a new Doppler index. Pediatrlnt, 1999, 41 (6): 722-727.
  • 8Matter M, Abdel-Hady H, Atria G, et al. Myocardial perform ance in asphyxiated full-term infants assessed by Doppler tissue imaging. Pediatr Cardiol, 2010, 31 (5): 634-642.
  • 9薛静,邓涛,张周龙,陈梅.组织多普勒与脉冲多普勒法Tei指数评价冠心病左心功能的对比研究[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2010,18(4):315-317. 被引量:24
  • 10高翔羽,杨波,黑明燕,王秀利,陈洋,孙迎军,佟念念.新生儿黄疸对正常足月儿心肌损伤危害的临床研究[J].中华儿科杂志,2012,50(5):343-349. 被引量:26

共引文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部