期刊文献+

绩效薪酬制会催生更多员工逢迎吗?基于资源保存理论的视角 被引量:5

Does Pay-for-performance Create More Ingratiation?From the Perspective of Conservation of Resources Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 绩效薪酬制是一把“双刃剑”,越来越多的研究开始关注它的负激励效应。本文基于资源保存理论,通过对零售业1559名员工调研数据进行实证分析,探讨了绩效薪酬制对逢迎行为的影响,以及绩效压力在两者关系中的中介作用。本文检验了自我效能感在绩效薪酬制与绩效压力关系中的调节作用,还进一步探索了自我效能感对绩效压力在绩效薪酬制和逢迎行为之间中介作用的调节作用。研究结果表明:绩效薪酬制确实会催生出更多的逢迎行为,绩效压力在绩效薪酬制与逢迎行为之间关系中起着中介作用。自我效能感负向调节绩效薪酬制与绩效压力之间的关系,但是自我效能感对绩效压力中介作用的调节效应未得到证实。 Pay-for-performance system is a"double-edged sword",more and more studies begin to pay attention to its negative incentive effect.Based on the conservation of resources theory,this paper makes an empirical analysis of the data from 1559 employees in the retail industry,and discusses the influence of Pay-for-performance system on ingratiation behavior and the mediating role of performance pressure in the relationship between them.This paper also explores the moderating effect of self-efficacy on the mediating effect of performance stress.The results show that Pay-for-performance system does lead to more ingratiating behaviors,and performance pressure plays an intermediary role in the relationship between Pay-for-performance system and ingratiating behaviors.Self-efficacy negatively moderates the relationship between performance pay system and performance pressure.However,it is not proved that self-efficacy negatively moderates the mediating role of performance pressure in the relationship between Pay-for-performance system and ingratiating behavior.
作者 刘颖 陈钰瑶 崔文韬 张正堂 Ying LIU;Yuyao CHEN;Wentao CUI;Zhengtang ZHANG(School of Economics and Management,Nanjing Institute of Technology,Nanjing 211167;School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093)
出处 《中国人力资源开发》 CSSCI 北大核心 2022年第12期99-111,共13页 Human Resources Development of China
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(72132003) 国家自然科学基金面上项目(71972097)。
关键词 绩效薪酬制 逢迎行为 绩效压力 自我效能感 资源保存理论 Pay-for-performance Ingratiation Behavior Performance Pressure Self-efficacy Conservation of Resources Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献170

  • 1汤丹丹,温忠麟.共同方法偏差检验:问题与建议[J].心理科学,2020,43(1):215-223. 被引量:433
  • 2陈云,杜鹏程.情感事件理论视角下自恋型领导对员工敌意的影响研究[J].管理学报,2020(3):374-382. 被引量:12
  • 3LAZEAR E P.Performance Pay and Productivity[J].American Economic Review,2000,90(5):1 346-1 361.
  • 4SCHAY B W.Impacts of Performance-contingent Pay on Employee Attitudes[J].Public Personnel Management,1998,17(2):237-250.
  • 5MCNABB R,WHITFIELD K.The Impact of Varying Types of Performance-related Pay and Employee Participation on Earnings[J].International Journal of Human Resource Management,2007,18(6):1 004-1 025.
  • 6WERNER S,WARD S G.Recent Compensation Research:An Eclectic Review[J].Human Resource Management Review,2004,14(2):201-227.
  • 7KELLOUGH J E,NIGRO L G.Pay for Performance in Georgia State Government:Employee Perspectives on Georgia Gain after 5 Years[J].Review of Public Personnel Administration,2002,22(2):146-166.
  • 8MICELI M P,HENEMAN R L.Contextual Determinants of Variable Pay Plan Design:A Proposed Research Framework[J].Human Resource Management Review,2000,10(3):289-305.
  • 9DONALDSON S I,GRANT-VALLONE E J.Understanding Self-report Bias in Organizational Behavior Research[J].Journal of Business and Psychology,2002,17(2):245-259.
  • 10KUHN K M,YOCKEY M D.Variable Pay as a Risky Choice:Determinants of the Relative Attractiveness of Incentive Plans[J].Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,2003,90(2):323-341.

共引文献204

同被引文献62

引证文献5

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部