期刊文献+

督导工作联盟问卷(受督导者版)的编制

Development of the Supervisory Working Alliance Questionnaire-Supervisee Version
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:编制适合我国受督导者的督导工作联盟问卷,分析其信度和效度。方法:在文献分析、开放式问卷调查、深度访谈和专家评价的基础上发展问卷的理论结构,对307名受督导者进行测量,经过项目分析和因素分析确定最终问卷。选取督导满意度问卷(SSQ)作为效标效度工具。结果:探索性因素分析显示目标任务一致、情感联结和投入3个因子累计方差贡献率为60.171%;验证性因素分析显示模型拟合度良好;问卷总体的内部一致性信度为0.863,各维度的内部一致性信度为0.713~0.776;2周后的重测信度为0.881;问卷与SSQ存在高度相关(r=0.701)。结论:督导工作联盟问卷(受督导者版)具有较好的信度和效度,可作为评估督导工作联盟的测量工具。 Objective:To develop the Supervisory Working Alliance Questionnaire-Supervisee Version among Chinese supervisees,and analyze its reliability and validity.Methods:The theoretical structure of the questionnaire was developed on the basis of literature analysis,open questionnaire survey,in-depth interview and expert evaluation.307 supervisees were tested for the project analysis,exploratory factor analysis(EFA)and confirmatory factor analysis(CFA).Supervisory Satisfaction Questionnaire was chosen as the criterion-related indicator.Results:EFA indicated that 60.171%of the total variance was explained by the 3 factors,namely,goal-task,bond,and engagement.The result of CFA showed a good fit between the structure and data.The overall internal consistency of the questionnaire was 0.863,and the Cronbachαcoefficients for the three dimensions ranged from 0.713 to 0.776.The test-retest reliability of the overall questionnaire was0.881.The criterion validity indicated that the total questionnaire had a strong correlation with the Supervisory Satisfaction Questionnaire(r=0.701).Conclusion:The Supervisory Working Alliance Questionnaire-Supervisee Version(SWAQ-SE)has high reliability and validity.It’s a valid measure of the supervisory working alliance.
作者 杨妲 田瑞琪 YANG Da;TIAN Rui-qi(Center of Psychological Research and Counseling,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China;Dazhou Central Hospital,Dazhou 635000,China;Institute of Applied Psychology,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu611756,China)
出处 《中国临床心理学杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期1476-1481,1475,共7页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基金 四川省哲学社会科学重点研究基地心理健康教育研究项目(XLJKJY2233B) 四川省心理学会科研规划项目(SCXLXH2021028) 西南交通大学2022年本科教育教学研究与改革项目(20220328)。
关键词 临床督导 督导工作联盟 问卷编制 信度 效度 Clinical supervision Supervisory working alliance Questionnaire development Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献84

  • 1徐青,杨阳.心理治疗临床督导理论模型综述[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2006,14(4):421-423. 被引量:9
  • 2Orlinsky DE, Ronnestad MH, Willutzki U. Fifty years of psychotherapy process-outcome research: Continuity and change. In Lambert MJ. Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley, 2004. 307-389.
  • 3Elvins R, Green J. The conceptualization and measurement of therapeutic alliance: An empirical review. Clinical Psy- chology Review, 2008, 28(7): 1167-1187.
  • 4Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic con- cept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Re- search and Practice, 1979, 16(3): 252-260.
  • 5Martin DJ, Garske JP, Davis MK. Relation of the therapeutic alliance with outcome and other variables: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2000, 68(3): 438-450.
  • 6朱旭.心理咨询中的工作同盟:概念化与发展模式.武汉:华中师范大学.2010.
  • 7Gaston L. The concept of the alliance and its role in psych- otherapy: Theoretical and empirical considerations. Psych- otherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 1990, 27(2): 143-153.
  • 8Gaston L. Reliability and criterion-related validity of the California Psychotherapy Alliance Scales-Patient version. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1991, 3(1): 68-74.
  • 9Horvath AO, Luborsky L. The role of the therapeutic alli- ance in psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993, 61(4): 561-573.
  • 10Hatcher RL, Barends AW. Patients' view of the alliance in psychotherapy: Exploratory factor analysis of three alliance measures. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1996, 64(6): 1326-1336.

共引文献1014

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部