1Nelson T O, Narens L. Why investigate metacngnition? Metacognition: knowing about knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994:1 -25
2Dunlosky J, Thiede K W. What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self- paced study. Acta Psyehologica, 1998, 98(1): 37-56
3Thiede W K, Dunlosky J. Toward a general model of self - regulated study: An analysis of selection of items for study and self- paced study time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1999, 25(4): 1024 1037
4Metcalfe J, Komell N. The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2003, 132(4): 530-542
5Komell N, Metealfe J. Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 2006, 32(3): 609 622
6Metcalfe J. Is study time allocated selectively to a region of proximal learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 2002, 131 (3) : 349 - 363
7Metcalfe J, Kornell N. A region of proximal learning model of study time allccation. Journal of Memory and Language, 2005, 52(4) : 463 - 477
8Koriat A, Bjork R A. Predicting one's own forgetting: The role of experience based and theory - based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004, 133(4):643- 656
9Koriat A, Bjork R A. Illusions of competence in monitoring one's knowledge during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2005, 31(2): 187-194
10Koriat A, Bjork R A. Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test. Memory & Cognition, 2006, 34(5) : 959 - 972
