摘要
《刑法》第94条的立法逻辑表明,只要实质行使侦查、检察、审判、监管职责的工作人员都可以视为司法工作人员。监察工作人员履行职务犯罪调查职责时,具备原职务犯罪侦查权的实质,基于职责决定主体性质的立法逻辑,此时监察工作人员具备准司法工作人员的基本属性,可以适用刑法有关司法工作人员犯罪的规定。监察工作人员在履行职务犯罪调查职责时,不仅要遵守《监察法》及其配套法律规范,还要符合刑法的有关规定。监察工作人员在职务犯罪调查过程中不履行、不正确履行职责的行为,可以构成刑法中有关司法工作人员犯罪而受到刑罚处罚。
The legislative logic of Article 94 of the Criminal Law shows that as long as the staff actually exercise the duties of investigation,prosecution,trial and supervision,they can be regarded as judicial staff. When the supervisory staff investigate duty crimes,they have the essence of the original power to investigate duty crimes. Based on the legislative logic that duty determines the nature of the subject,the supervisory staff have the basic attributes of quasi-judicial staff at this time and can apply the provisions of the Criminal Law on crimes committed by judicial staff. When performing their duties of investigating duty crimes,the supervisory staff must not only abide by the Supervision Law and its supporting legal norms,but also comply with the relevant provisions of the Criminal Law. The behaviour of supervisory staff members who fail to perform or incorrectly perform their duties in the course of duty crime investigation may constitute crimes committed by judicial staff in the Criminal Law and be subject to criminal punishment.
作者
谢芳
刘艳红
XIE Fang;LIU Yanhong
出处
《福建师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2022年第6期156-166,172,共12页
Journal of Fujian Normal University:Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition
基金
国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字经济的刑事安全风险防范体系建构研究”(21&ZD209)
国家社会科学基金青年项目“个人信息有序共享的刑民一体化保护研究”(20CFX027)
江苏省高校“青蓝工程”暨江苏省第五期“333工程”科研资助项目“监察机关权力运行机制的法治化路径研究”(BRA2019042)。
