期刊文献+

金融业信息化项目绩效评价研究——以金融基础设施开发类信息化项目为例 被引量:2

Research on Performance Evaluation of Financial Industry Digital Transformation Projects:An Example of the Financial Infrastructure Development Informatization Project
下载PDF
导出
摘要 金融基础设施建设中的开发类信息化项目,具有社会影响大、建设周期长、资金投入大、建设难度高等鲜明特征。如何以绩效评价为引领确保项目成效、规避建设风险,是项目建设单位面临的重要课题。本文针对开发类信息化项目管理中普遍存在的问题,对金融基础设施开发类信息化项目的绩效评价体系设计提出了具体的思路和方法,从而为金融基础设施建设单位开展信息化项目绩效评价提供参考。 Development informatization projects in the construction of financial infrastructure are characterized by large social impact, long construction period, large capital investment and high construction difficulty. How to ensure project effectiveness and avoid construction risks under the guidance of performance evaluation is an important issue faced by project construction entity. This paper puts forward specific ideas and methods for the performance evaluation system design of financial infrastructure development informatization projects, aiming at summarizing the common problems in development informatization project, so as to provide reference for financial infrastructure construction entities to carry out informatization project’s performance evaluation.
作者 郝岸 Hao An
出处 《管理会计研究》 2022年第6期82-91,共10页 MANAGEMENT ACCOUNTING STUDIES
关键词 绩效评价 开发类信息化项目 金融基础设施 Performance Evaluation Development Informatization Projects Financial Infrastructure
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献98

  • 1朱孔来.评价指标的非线性无量纲模糊处理方法[J].统计与信息论坛,1997,12(3):11-15. 被引量:18
  • 2朱卫平,伦蕊.高新技术企业科技投入与绩效相关性的实证分析[J].科技管理研究,2004,24(5):7-9. 被引量:95
  • 3李燕凌.详论公共事业组织的本质特征[J].中国行政管理,2005(1):95-99. 被引量:11
  • 4THOMPSON J D. Organizations in Action[M]. NewYork: McGraw Hill, 1967.
  • 5FISHER F M, TEMIN P. Returns to scale in research and devel-opment:what does the Schumpeterian hypothesis imply? [J]. Journal of Political Economy,1973(81) :56-70.
  • 6GRILICHES Z. Returns to research and development expenditures in the private sector[A]. In: KENDRICK JOHN W, BEATRICE N VACCARA (eds.). New developments in productivity measurement and analysis[M]. Chicago:Chicago University Press, 1980:419-454.
  • 7PAVITT K, ROBSON M, TOWNSEND J. The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK: 1945-1983[J]. Journal of Industrial Economics, 1987 (35):297-316.
  • 8ACS Z J,AUDRETSCH D B. R&D,firm size and innovative activity[A]. In:ACS,Z J,AUDRETSCH D B. (Eds.). Innovation and technological change: An international comparison[M]. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.
  • 9COHEN W M,KLEPPER S. A reprise of size and R&D[J]. Economic Journal, 1996 (106) : 925-952.
  • 10HENDERSON R, COCKBURN I. Firm size and research productivity in drug discovery [A]. In: JACOBZONE S. (Ed.). La Sant'e:Trajectoires D'avenir. INSEE[C]. Paris, 1997.

共引文献200

同被引文献25

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部