期刊文献+

基于扩展计划行为理论的驾驶员跟驰意向分析 被引量:1

Analysis of driver′s car-following intention based on extended planning behavior theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 未来道路交通流将呈现自动驾驶车辆和传统车辆混行的现象,为探究人机混驾环境下传统车辆驾驶员对自动驾驶车辆跟驰意向的影响因素,引入驾驶员对自动驾驶车辆的了解程度、风险感知及接受程度3个变量,构建基于扩展计划行为理论的驾驶员跟驰意向模型框架.通过问卷调查获取331份主观评价数据,并借助SPSS和AMOS软件检验数据的内部一致性及可靠性.运用结构方程模型进行路径分析及中介效应分析以检验影响因素间的关系.结果表明,基于扩展计划行为理论的驾驶员跟驰意向结构方程模型对人机混驾环境下驾驶员的跟驰意向具有良好解释力;行为态度、主观规范和知觉行为控制对驾驶员跟驰意向具有显著正向直接效应;风险感知和接受程度通过中介变量对驾驶员跟驰意向产生显著间接效应,其中,风险感知作用为负向,接受程度作用为正向;了解程度对驾驶员跟驰意向既有显著正向直接效应又有显著正向间接效应.研究结果可作为人机混驾环境下车辆交互行为分析的基础. Road traffic flow will show the phenomenon of mixed driving of autonomous vehicles and traditional vehicles in the future. In order to explore psychological factors that affect traditional vehicle drivers’ intention to follow autonomous vehicles in the human-machine hybrid driving environment, three variables of driver’s understanding, risk perception, and acceptance of autonomous vehicles are introduced to construct an extended theoretical framework of planning behavior. Three hundred thirty-one subjective evaluation data are obtained through questionnaire survey. The internal consistency and reliability of the data are tested by SPSS and AMOS softwares. Finally, the path analysis and mediation effect analysis are carried out by using structural equation model to test relationship among the influencing factors. The results show that the structural equation model of driver’s carfollowing intention based on the theory of extended planning behavior has good explanatory power for the driver’s carfollowing intention in the mixed driving environment. Driver’s behavioral attitude, subjective norm and perceived behavioral control of autonomous vehicles have a significant positive and direct effect on driver’s car-following intention. Driver’s risk perception and acceptance of autonomous vehicles have a significant indirect effect on driver’s car-following intention through intermediary variables, in which the effect of risk perception is negative, and the effect of acceptance is positive. The degree of understanding has both a significant positive direct effect and a significant positive indirect effect on driver’s car-following intention. The research results can be used as the basis for vehicle interaction behavior analysis in the human-machine hybrid driving environment.
作者 李霞 郭梦婷 张孝铭 啜二勇 周巍 LI Xia;GUO Mengting;ZHANG Xiaoming;CHUO Eryong;ZHOU Wei(School of Civil Engineering and Transportation,Hebei University of Technology,Tianjin 300401,P.R.China;Business School,Imperial College,London SW72AZ,UK;Tianjin Institute of Transportation Science,Tianjin 300060,P.R.China;Office for Beijing-Xiong’an Expressway,Hebei Expressway Group Limited,Baoding 071700,Hebei Province,P.R.China)
出处 《深圳大学学报(理工版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期118-126,共9页 Journal of Shenzhen University(Science and Engineering)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51908187)。
关键词 交通工程 跟驰意向 扩展计划行为理论 结构方程模型 中介效应 人机混驾 traffic engineering car-following intention extended theory of planning behavior structural equation model mediation effect human driven and autonomous vehicles
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献53

  • 1刘靖炜,刘爱书.大学生竞争态度与大五人格关系的研究[J].中国健康心理学杂志,2008,16(4):382-385. 被引量:22
  • 2李凤芝,李昌吉,龙云芳,詹承烈,胡冰霜.汽车驾驶员攻击性驾驶行为的心理因素分析[J].四川大学学报(医学版),2004,35(4):568-570. 被引量:24
  • 3韦华,张伟.中美两国汽车驾驶安全影响因素研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2004,14(9):24-28. 被引量:20
  • 4郑忆石.论文化素质与人格塑造[J].中国人民大学学报,1998,(2).38-41.
  • 5Neuman T R, Pfefer R, Slack K L, et al. Guidance for implementation of the AASHTO strategic highway safety plan[R]. Volume 1: A Guide for Addressing Aggressive- Driving Collisions. NCHRP Report 500. Washington, DC: Transportation Research Board, 2003.
  • 6Reason J, Manstead A, Straling S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction?[J].Ergonomics, 1990, 33(10-11): 1315-1332.
  • 7Lawton R, Parker D, Stradling S, et al. Predicting road traffic accidents: The role of social deviance and violations[J]. British Journal of Psychology, 1997,88(2):249-262.
  • 8Mesken J, Lajunen T, Summala H. Interpersonal violations, speeding violations and their relation toaccident involvement in Finland[J]. Ergonomics, 2002,45(7): 469-483.
  • 9Blockey L, Hartley L. Aberrant driving behavior: errors and violations[J]. Ergonomics, 1995, 39(9): 1759-1771.
  • 10Ajzen I. Theory of planned behavior[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991, 50(2):179-211.

共引文献42

同被引文献13

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部