摘要
惟有坚持马克思在《资本论》中阐释的科学资本观,划清唯物史观与唯心史观两种不同资本观的界限,才能弄清当代中国现实经济中的资本现象,从而正确规范和引导各类资本健康发展。在发展商品生产的现实经济中,公有资本与私有资本存在某种程度的共性,但是存在本质区别。要充分认识公私资本的划分是判断“各类资本”性质的基础性规范。从对当代中国社会经济的作用看公私资本的矛盾关系,两者既有统一性,又有对立性,尤其不能忘记公私资本的对立性。从目前指导规范和引导资本健康发展的实际工作看,应当高度重视恢复和确保公有资本在社会总资本中占主体地位,有效发挥国有资本的主导作用,严格治理私有资本的无序发展,加强对引进外资质量和数量的控制,让国有资本牢牢控制国家金融系统。
Only by adhering to the scientific capital concept explained by Marx in Das Capital,and making a clear distinction between historical materialism and historical idealism,can we understand the capital phenomenon in contemporary China’s real economy,so as to correctly regulate and guide the healthy development of all kinds of capital.In the real economy of developing commodity production,public capital and private capital have some similarities,but there are essential differences.We should fully understand that the division of public and private capital is the basic criterion for judging the nature of all kinds of capital.From the perspective of the role of public and private capital in contemporary China’s social economy,the contradiction between them is both unity and opposition,especially the antagonism of public and private capital should not be forgotten.From the current practical work of guiding and standardizing the healthy development of capital,we should attach great importance to restoring and ensuring the dominant position of public capital in total social capital,effectively play the leading role of state-owned capital,strictly control the disorderly development of private capital,strengthen control over the quality and quantity of foreign capital introduced,and let state-owned capital firmly control the national financial system.
作者
何干强
He Ganqiang(School of Economics,Nanjing University of Finance and Economics,Nanjing Jiangsu 210046,China;Academy of Marxism,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100026,China)
出处
《河北经贸大学学报》
北大核心
2023年第1期1-18,共18页
Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business
关键词
《资本论》
资本范畴
公有资本
私有资本
矛盾关系
科学规范
Das Capital
capital category
public capital
private capital
contradictory relationship
scientific norms