期刊文献+

中概股跨境监管博弈:评析与思考 被引量:4

Cross-border Regulatory Wrestling Regarding Chinese Concepts Stocks:Comments and Thoughts
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前中概股跨境监管博弈的焦点是中概股企业审计底稿的检查问题,即美方能够以何种方式、在何种范围和程度内获取和检查存放于中国境内的审计底稿。这一问题关涉双方各自国内立法和监管主权,需要在中国证监会、中国财政部和美国公众公司会计监督委员会新近签署的审计监管协议的基础上,通过务实监管合作加以解决。在此过程中,应尽可能兼顾中方关于敏感信息、国家安全的关切和美方关于全面获取财务相关信息的关切。还应以此为契机,改进和完善中国作为母国对中概股企业的监管,淡化对境外发行上市行为的管控,更多地着眼于提升资本市场质量和保护境内外投资者,并尽快明确和细化我国证券法域外适用的相关标准和条件。 The focus of the current cross-border regulatory wrestling between China and US Regarding Chinese Concepts Stocks(CCS)is the examination of the audit working papers of CCS companies,i.e.,in what way and scope,and to what extent can the US authorities have access to those audit working papers stored within the territory of China.This problem relates to the domestic laws and regulatory sovereignty of the two countries respectively,and needs to be solved through pragmatic regulatory cooperation on the basis of the newly signed Statement of Protocol among CSRC,the Ministry of Finance of China and PCAOB.In that process,consideration should be given in an as-balanced-as-possible way to both the concerns on the part of China regarding sensitive information and national security,and those on the part of the US regarding having complete access to the relevant fi nancial information.Meanwhile,efforts should be made to improve the regulation of CCS companies by China as the parent country.For example,the control on overseas issuance and listing should be loosened,with more importance being attached to improving the quality of the capital market and protecting both domestic and overseas investors.The relevant conditions and criteria for the extraterritorial application of Chinese securities law should also be clarifi ed and specifi ed.
作者 廖凡 LIAO Fan(CASS University Law School,Beijing 102488,China)
出处 《上海对外经贸大学学报》 北大核心 2023年第1期57-67,共11页 Journal of Shanghai University of International Business and Economics
基金 国家社科基金重大项目“我国经济制裁法律体系构建研究”(项目编号:21&ZD202)资助,项目阶段性成果。
关键词 中概股 跨境监管 审计底稿 域外适用 涉外法治 Chinese concepts stocks(CCS) cross-border regulation audit working papers extraterritorial application international rule of law
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献15

  • 1朱绵茂.论美国金融监管法律的域外适用——从SEC起诉德勤上海谈起[J].浙江金融,2012(8):36-39. 被引量:3
  • 2PCAOB, Activity Summary and Audit Implications for Reverse Mergers Involving Companies from the China Region:January 1,2007 through March 31,2010,PCAOB Research Note # 2011-P1,p. 1,note 1,available at http ://pcaobus.org/Research/Documents/Chinese_Reverse_ Merger_Research_Note.pdf.
  • 3James S. Ang & Zhiqian Jiang & Chaopeng Wu,Good Apples,Bad Apples:Sorting Among Chinese Companies Traded in the US,at http://ssrn.com/abstract=2024826, Feb.14 2013.
  • 4Jan Jindra & Torben Voetmannb & Ralph A. Walklingc, Reverse Mergers:The Chinese Experience,Fisher College of Business Working Paper Series,WP 2012 -03 -018,2012.
  • 5Mark Humphery -Jenner, The Governance and Perfor- mance of Chinese Companies Listed Abroad:An Analysis of China's Merits Review Approach to Overseas List- ings,Journal of Corporate Law Studies,Vol. 12,2012.
  • 6Benjamin A. Templin,Chinese Reverse Mergers,Account- ing Regimes,and /he Rule of Law in China,Thomas Jef- ferson Law Review,No. 1,2011.
  • 7蔡婷贻,王真.中美"会计悬崖"[J].财经,2013,(1).
  • 8Paul Gillis, CSRC comments on PCAOB/SEC tiff, at http ://www.chinaaccountingblog.com/weblog/csrc -com- ments-on-pcaobsec.html, Jan. 18,2013.
  • 9Eric J. Pan,Challenge of International Cooperation and Institutional Design in Financial Supervision: Beyond Transgovernmental Networks,Chicago Journal of Interna- tional Law,Vol.ll No.l,2010.
  • 10PCAOB,Final Rules Relating To The Oversight Of Non-U.S. Public Accounting Firms,at http://pcaobus. org/Rules/Rulemaking/Docket013/2004 -06 -09_Release_2004 - 005.pdf, Dec.26,2012.

共引文献12

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部