开放科学环境下科技安全的情报保障研究

Research on Intelligence Guarantee to Maintain Scientific and Technological Security in Open Scientific Environment

[目的/意义]从竞争和对抗角度看,对手情报活动对我方科技安全造成了严重威胁。开放科学环境由于拓展了开源情报的范围,使这种威胁更为突出。情报保障是维护科技安全的积极模式,对于开放科学环境下的科技安全具有无可替代的维护作用。[方法/过程]在分析对手情报活动对科技安全的状态、保护能力和态势等方面的威胁基础上,围绕情报需求、功能和应用,构建了情报保障体系框架;从运行理念、运行环境、运行主体和介入科技安全管理决策路径等方面,提出了情报保障体系的运行模式。[结果/结论]对手对我方开展的安全情报活动和竞争情报活动均可能威胁我方科技安全,情报保障可通过创造拒他和利己的信息环境、塑造可控的安全态势等,保障科技交流安全、敏感信息安全和自主可控安全。情报保障体系需要在“挑战—应对”型运行理念的指导和全员参与运行环境的支撑下,通过多元主体的协同和介入决策的路径建设,推动其落地实践和提质增效。

[Purpose/significance] From the perspective of competition and confrontation, rival intelligence activities pose a serious threat to scientific and technological security.The open science environment has expanded the scope of open source intelligence, making this threat more prominent.Intelligence guarantee is a positive model for maintaining scientific and technological security.It plays an irreplaceable role in safeguarding scientific and technological security in an open scientific environment.[Method/process] Based on the analysis of the threat of opponent’s intelligence activities to the state, protection ability and situation of scientific and technological security, this paper constructs the framework of intelligence support system around the demand, function and application of intelligence;this paper puts forward the operation mode of intelligence guarantee system from the aspects of operation concept, operation environment, operation subject and decision-making path of scientific and technological security management.[Result/conclusion] The security intelligence activities and competitive intelligence activities carried out by the opponent against us may threaten our scientific and technological security.Intelligence can ensure the security of scientific and technological exchange, sensitive information and independent and controllable security by creating an information environment that rejects others and benefits oneself and shaping a controllable security situation.The intelligence support system needs to be supported by the “challenge-response” operation concept and the full participation operation environment, and promote its implementation practice, quality and efficiency through the coordination of multiple subjects and the construction of decision-making paths.