期刊文献+

投资仲裁法律适用中投资者行为与东道国措施的关系分析 被引量:1

Analysis of the Relationship between Investor Behavior and Host State Measures in the Application of Investment Arbitration Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在东道国对投资者行为采取限制措施而产生的国际投资争端的法律纠纷中,投资者对东道国提出仲裁请求,东道国则提出“投资行为违法”抗辩,其实质是投资争端中责任归属问题处理的法律适用。投资仲裁中对责任归属如何确定,不仅取决于投资者行为与东道国措施之间是否存在因果关系,而且涉及东道国措施与条约义务及投资损失的关系,同时需要分析违法投资行为对投资仲裁请求的不利影响。理论上,应区分“投资产生的不合法”与“投资履行的不合法”,并允许东道国依据国内法对履行中的不合法行为进行制裁。 In the legal dispute of international investment caused by host state restrictive measures on investor behavior,when investor makes arbitration request against host state,the latter would claim the defense of“illegal investment behavior”,which is in essence the allocation of liability in the investment dispute.How to determine the liability in investment arbitration not only depends on whether there is a causal relationship between the investor behavior and the host state measures,but also involves the relationship between the host state measures and treaty obligations and investment losses.At the same time,it is necessary to analyze the adverse impact of illegal investment behavior on the investment arbitration claim.Theoretically,a distinction should be made between“illegality of investment per se”and“illegality of investment performance”,and the host state should be allowed to impose sanctions on illegality of performance according to its domestic laws.
作者 孙南申 Sun Nanshen
出处 《南大法学》 2023年第1期21-33,共13页 NanJing University Law Journal
基金 国家社会科学基金项目“国际投资争端解决程序的保障机制研究”(项目编号:17BFX145)成果。
关键词 投资仲裁 投资者行为 东道国措施 东道国抗辩 法律适用 Investment Arbitration Investor Behavior Host State Measures Defense of Host State Applicable Law
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1汤维建,陈开欣.试论英美证据法上的刑事证明标准[J].政法论坛,1993,11(4):79-84. 被引量:53
  • 2李双元.国际私法[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2007:30.
  • 3Richard H. Kreindler. Aspects of Illegality in the Formation and Performance of Contracts [J]. Transnational Dispute Man- agement, 2004, 1 (3).
  • 4陈安.中外双边投资协定中的四大“安全阀”不宜贸然拆除——美、加型BITs谈判范本关键性“争端解决”条款剖析[M]//.陈安.陈安论国际经济法学.上海:复旦大学出版社,2008.
  • 5王海浪.“落后”还是“超前”?——论中国对ICSID管辖权的同意[M]//.国际经济法学刊.北京:北京大学出版社,2006.
  • 6Jos6 Rose11 and Harvey Prager. Illicit Commissions and International Arbitration: The Question of Proof [J].Arbitration Inter- national, 1999, 15 ( 4 ) : 347.
  • 7K. Mills. Corruption and Other Illegality in the Formation and Performance of Contracts and in the Conduct of Arbitration rela- ting Thereto[J]//. ICC Congress Series No. 11. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2003:295.
  • 8Final Award in Case No. 6497 of 1994 [Z]//. Albert Jan van den Berg (ed). Yearbook Commercial Arbitration 1999. The Hague : Kluwer Law International, 1999, 24a:71.
  • 9Adrian Keane, James Griffiths, Paul McKeown. The Modem Law of Evidence IMp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010: 102.
  • 10A. Timothy Martin. International Arbitration and Corruption: An Evolving Standard [ J ). Transnational Dispute Management, 2004, 1 (2) :5.

共引文献8

同被引文献1

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部