期刊文献+

护理实习生护理道德测评表的改良及信效度检验 被引量:1

Improvement of nursing ethics evaluation form for nursing interns and the reliability and validity test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的基于前期研制的护理道德测评表在临床使用后继续改良,并检验其信效度,为临床护理实践中开展德育工作提供测评工具。方法以“知信行”理论模式为依据,通过访谈、文献回顾、专家咨询改良护理实习生护理道德测评表,并选取2020年6—12月在某教学医院临床实习的护生共92名进行调查,以检验信效度。结果共进行两轮专家函询,专家函询问卷回收率均为100%,专家权威系数≥0.7,Kendall协同系数(W)为0.683(P<0.001),内容效度为0.887,总信度系数为0.805,由5项一级测评指标,15项二级测评指标和33项三级测评指标构成。结论改良的护理实习生护理道德测评表有良好的信度和效度,适合在临床实习中护理实习生的护理道德测评工作的使用。 Objective To improve the nursing ethics evaluation form based on the previous development after clinical use and test its reliability and validity,so as to provide an evaluation tool for carrying out moral education in clinical nursing practice.Methods Based on the theoretical model of"Knowledge-Attitude/Belief-Practice",the evaluation form of nursing ethics of nursing interns was improved through interview,literature review and expert consultation.A total of 92 nursing students who had clinical practice in a teaching hospital from June to December 2020 were selected for investigation to test the reliability and validity.Results Two rounds of expert correspondence were conducted.The recovery rate of the expert correspondence questionnaire was 100%,the expert authority coe fficient was≥0.7,the Kendall collaboration coe fficient(W)was 0.683(P<0.001),the content validity was 0.887,and the total reliability coe fficient was 0.805.The questionnaire was composed of 5 primary evaluation indicators,15 secondary evaluation indicators,and 33 tertiary evaluation indicators.Conclusion The improved nursing ethics evaluation form for nursing interns has good reliability and validity,which is suitable for the evaluation of nursing ethics of nursing interns in clinical practice.
作者 章雪玲 刘春玲 罗艳华 李妍 ZHANG Xueling;LIU Chunling;LUO Yanhua;LI Yan(The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University,510150,Guangzhou,China;不详)
出处 《护理实践与研究》 2023年第1期152-156,共5页 Nursing Practice and Research
基金 广东省教育科学“十三五”规划研究项目(编号:2020GXJK109)。
关键词 护理 实习生 道德 测评工具 改良 Nursing Trainee Morality Evaluation tools Improvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献59

共引文献125

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部