对中国武术学科“三大体系”建构的理论之思

Theoretical Reflections on the Construction of the “Three Major Systems” of Chinese Wushu Disciplines

自中华人民共和国成立以来,中国武术在“三大体系”的建设上取得了丰硕成果,但学科发展日渐式微、学术体系缺乏特质、话语表达贫弱乏力是当前中国武术发展中存在的问题。鉴于中国武术学科尚未设置为独立学科,当下对构建中国武术学科“三大体系”的讨论并非类同于一般成熟学科的研究范式,而倾向于是前瞻性的理论设想与实践性的基础研究,要结合中国武术学科的发展现状,从“三大体系”的内涵及相互关系视角进行专门的探讨和辨析。研究认为,在学科建构上要探寻理论路径,建立中国武术自主性理论体系,规范教材编写,形成匹配学科发展的教材体系,构建人才梯队,促进师资引进与培养平衡发展;在学术建构上要坚守理论自信,强化中国武术研究的主体性,提高问题意识,注重中国武术研究的价值性,突出学科优势,建立中国武术研究的标识性;在话语建构上要实施话语反思、话语转换、话语原创等策略。

Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China, Chinese Wushu has achieved fruitful results during the construction of the “three systems”, but the declining development of disciplines, the lack of academic system, the poor and weak expression of discourse are the current problems existing in the development of Chinese Wushu. As Chinese Wushu has not yet been set as an independent discipline, the construction of “three systems” of Chinese Wushu discipline is not similar to general mature discipline research paradigm, but a forward-looking theoretical assumption and practical basic research. The discipline construction should combine the development status of Chinese Wushu discipline, analyze and discuss the discipline construction from the connotation of the “three systems” and mutual relations. In the discipline construction, it is necessary to explore the theoretical path, establish the autonomous theory system of Chinese Wushu, standardize the textbook compilation, form the textbook system matching the discipline development,build the talent team, and promote the balanced development of teacher introduction and training. In the academic construction, we should stick to the theoretical confidence, strengthen the subjectivity, improve the problem awareness of Chinese Wushu research,highlight the value and discipline advantages of Chinese Wushu research, and implement strategies of discourse reflection, discourse transformation and original discourse.