期刊文献+

“谋利型”诉讼维权的生成机理及其后果——基于一起专利诉讼维权个案的观察 被引量:1

The Generation Mechanism and Consequences of“Profit-seeking”Litigation Rights Protection:A Case Study of Patent Litigation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 “谋利型”诉讼维权是实践中较为普遍的现象,学术界对其生成和维系机理的研究较为有限。在以实证研究方式考察个体诉讼维权历程及过程的基础上,研究显示,个体诉讼维权呈现出从依法维权到以法谋利的演进轨迹,其谋利的行动逻辑主要受司法裁判的影响。正是由于司法裁判规则的建构性和反向塑造功能,为个体通过诉讼方式以谋取经济利益营造了机会空间,这使得个体的“谋利型”诉讼维权模式在实践中得以生成和维系。“谋利型”诉讼维权模式对司法具有较大的破坏作用,不仅浪费司法资源,还有损司法权威和公正。就“谋利型”诉讼维权的规制而言,司法控制与行政规制协同治理的方式是一种可行的路径选择。 Though the“profit-seeking”litigation rights protection is fairly common in practice,the relevant research on its generation and maintenance mechanism in the academic community is relatively rare.Through an empirical research on the history and evolution of the individual litigation rights protection,the paper reveals that such protection has presented a change from law-based rights protection to law-based profit-seeking action,whose logic for profit-seeking is mainly affected by judicial decisions.It is due to the constructive and reverse-shaping functions of judicial adjudication rules that opportunities are created to seek economic benefits through litigation,which has resulted in the generation of a“profit-seeking”litigation rights protection model and its maintenance in reality.This model has a destructive effect on the judicial system,which not only wastes judicial resources but also damages judicial authority and justice.As for regulating“profit-seeking”litigation rights protection,it is feasible to take the mixed approach of coordinated governance of judicial control and administrative regulation.
作者 洪登光 HOGN Deng-guang(Yunnan University,Kunming 650504,China)
出处 《云南大学学报(社会科学版)》 2023年第1期127-135,共9页 The Journal of Yunnan University:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 诉讼维权 谋利 反向塑造 生成机理 规制 litigation rights protection profit-seeking reverse-shaping generation mechanism regulation
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献174

共引文献1108

同被引文献25

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部