期刊文献+

未服药双相抑郁与单相抑郁患者多体素磁共振波谱和弥散峰度成像研究 被引量:1

Multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion kurtosis imaging in medication-free bipolar and unipolar depression patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较双相抑郁和单相抑郁患者脑代谢物及脑部微观结构差异,探索可以用来鉴别双相抑郁和单相抑郁的客观影像学指标。方法:收集2017年9月—2019年1月于汕头大学精神卫生中心门诊就医的20例单相抑郁患者(单相抑郁组)和10例双相抑郁患者(双相抑郁组),另外同期招募20名健康人员(健康对照组),进行T2加权成像、多体素磁共振波谱成像及弥散峰度成像检查。结果:与健康对照组相比,单相、双相抑郁组患者大部分脑区出现了较一致的脑代谢物水平及弥散峰度成像参数的变化,但单相及双相抑郁患者胆碱复合物和谷氨酸的变化在不同脑区则有所不同。双相抑郁患者平均弥散峰度值降低的脑区更加广泛,前扣带回、前额叶白质、左侧丘脑的平均弥散峰度值比单相抑郁组降低(P值均<0.05)。结论:双相抑郁患者脑微观结构受到的损伤比单相抑郁更严重。双相抑郁患者前额叶白质谷氨酸及左侧前额叶白质胆碱复合物浓度升高,可能是单相及双相抑郁在代谢物改变上的重要鉴别点。 Objective:To compare the differences in brain metabolites and brain microstructure between patients with bipolar depression and unipolar depression,and to explore objective imaging indicators that can be used to identify bipolar depression and unipolar depression.Methods:20 patients with unipolar depression(unipolar depression group)and 10 patients with bipolar depression(bipolar depression group)who were treated in the outpatient department of Shantou University Mental Health Center from September 2017 to January 2019 were collected,and an additional 20 healthy individuals(healthy control group)were recruited during the same period.All study subjects underwent T2-weighted imaging,multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy and diffusion kurtosis imaging.Results:Compared with the healthy control group,the unipolar and bipolar depression groups showed more consistent changes in brain metabolite levels and diffusion kurtosis imaging parameters in most brain regions,but changes in choline-containing compounds and glutamate differed in different brain regions in unipolar and bipolar depression patients.The decrease of the mean kurtosis of diffusion in the bipolar depression group was more extensive,and the mean kurtosis of the anterior cingulate gyrus,prefrontal white matter,and left thalamus were lower than that of the unipolar depression group(all P<0.05).Conclusion:Brain microstructure damage is more severe in patients with bipolar depression than in unipolar depression.Increased concentrations of glutamate in the prefrontal white matter and choline-containing compounds in the left prefrontal white matter in patients with bipolar depression may be important distinguishing points for metabolite changes in unipolar and bipolar depression.
作者 孔令梅 张印南 林枫枫 沈苑玉 张海都 吴仁华 KONG Lingmei;ZHANG Yinnan;LIN Fengfeng;SHEN Yuanyu;ZHANG Haidu;WU Renhua(Department of Medical Imaging,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College,Shantou 515041,China;Shantou University Mental Health Center,Shantou 515065,China)
出处 《汕头大学医学院学报》 2022年第4期225-229,共5页 Journal of Shantou University Medical College
基金 广东省医学科研基金项目(B2021204)。
关键词 多体素磁共振波谱成像 弥散峰度成像 单相抑郁 双相抑郁 multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy diffusion kurtosis imaging unipolar depression bipolar despression
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1李建军,孔祥泉,林明方,王桂华,蒋湘玲,李传资,余宁,赵应满,郭敏.青年抑郁症患者额叶三维氢质子波谱和扩散张量成像研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(5):659-662. 被引量:7
  • 2杨琼,洪楠,黄薛冰,于欣.老年抑郁症脑白质异常的磁共振扩散张量研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2007,23(9):1300-1303. 被引量:16
  • 3Grisk O, Retting R. Interactions between the sympathetic nerv- ous system and the kidneys in arterial. Cardiovasc Res, 2004,61 (2) :238-246.
  • 4Ong KL, Cheung BM, Man YB, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999--2004. Hypertension, 2007,49(1) :69-75.
  • 5Jonas BS, Franks P, Ingram DD. Are symptoms of anxiety and depression risk factors for hypertension? Longitudinal evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey I Ep- idemiologic Follow-up Study. Arch Fam Med, 1997,6(1) :43-49.
  • 6Cheng Y, Xu J, Yu H, et al. Delineation of early and later adult onset depression by diffusion tensor imaging. PLoS One, 2014,9 (11) :e112307.
  • 7Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging. The quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med, 2005, 53(6) : 1432-1440.
  • 8Zhuo J, Xu S, Proctor JL, et al. Diffusion kurtosis as an in vivo imaging marker for reactive astrogliosis in traumatic brain injury. Neuroimage, 2012,59(1) :467-477.
  • 9Yablonskiy DA, Bretthorst GL, Ackerman JJ. Statistical model for diIusion attenuated MR signal. Magn Reson Med, 2003, 50 (4) : 664-669.
  • 10Niendorf T, Dijkhuizen RM, Norris DG, et al. Biexponential diffusion attenuation in various states of brain tissue: Implica- tions for diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med, 1996, 36(6) :847-857.

共引文献21

同被引文献6

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部