期刊文献+

基于改进GRA-多分类Logistic模型的地铁换乘方式选择影响因素分析

Factor Analysis of Influencing Choice of Subway Transfer Mode based on Improved GRA-Multi-Class Logistic Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对传统灰色关联分析法进行改进,结合多分类Logistic模型,构建了改进GRA-多分类Logistic模型.对地铁出行者的多个影响因素进行分析,得到主要影响因素对地铁换乘方式选择的影响程度,从而掌握选择不同地铁换乘方式的居民的实际换乘需求.以哈尔滨地铁换乘方式为例,采用SPSS软件进行分析.结果表明:出行者的年龄、出行时间、出行距离是地铁换乘方式的主要影响因素.偏向于选择地铁与自行车、地铁与出租车换乘的乘客主要为中青年群体,年龄在45岁以下居多;短时间内出行时,乘客更加注重时间成本,偏向于选择地铁与网约车换乘;长距离出行时,为减少中途换乘不便,乘客更偏向于选择地铁与地铁换乘、地铁与公交换乘. In order to grasp the actual transfer needs of residents who choose different subway transfer methods,the traditional gray correlation analysis method is improved.Combined with the multi-class logistic model,and the improved GRA-multi-class logistic model is constructed.The multiple influencing factors of subway travelers are analyzed,and the influence of the main influencing factors on the choice of subway transfer mode is obtained.Taking Harbin subway transfer method as an example,SPSS software is used for the analysis.The results show that age,travel time,and travel distance are the main influencing factors for the subway transfer mode.Passengers who prefer to transfer to subway by bicycle and taxi are mainly young and middle-aged people,mostly under 45 years old.When traveling in a short period of time,passengers pay more attention to time cost and prefer to choose subway and car-hailing transfer.When traveling for long distances,passengers are more inclined to choose subway-to-metro transfer and subway-to-bus transfer in order to reduce the inconvenience of midway transfer.
作者 裴玉龙 姜淑娜 PEI Yulong;JIANG Shuna(School of Traffic and Transportation,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)
出处 《大连交通大学学报》 CAS 2022年第6期1-6,共6页 Journal of Dalian Jiaotong University
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51278158)。
关键词 城市交通 地铁换乘方式 改进GRA-多分类Logistic模型 出行效率 urban traffic subway transfer mode improved GRA-multi-class logistic model travel efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献56

  • 1刘振,周溪召.巢式Logit模型在交通方式选择行为中的应用[J].上海海事大学学报,2006,27(3):66-70. 被引量:20
  • 2陆华普.交通规划理论与方法[M].2版.北京:清华大学出版社,2006.
  • 3贾洪飞,龚勃文,宗芳.交通方式选择的非集计模型及其应用[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2007,37(6):1288-1293. 被引量:69
  • 4Debrezion G, Pels E, Rietveld P. Modelling the Joint AccessMode and Railway Station Choice[J]. Transportation Re-search Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2009, 45(1): 270-283.
  • 5Ivanoca O. A Note on the Consistent Aggregation of NestedLogit Demand Function[J]. Transportation Research Part B,2005, 39(10): 890-895.
  • 6Jiang S., Du Y. Combining revealed and stated preference methods to evaluate the use of bicycle-sharing systems[A]. In: American society of civil engineers, proceedings of the fourth international conference on transportation Engineering[C]. Chengdu: ASCE, 2013:2921-2926.
  • 7Shaheen S. A., Zhang H., Martin E., et al. China's Hangzhou public bicycle: understanding early adoption and behavioral response to bikesharing[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011, 2247(2247): 33-41.
  • 8Bachand-Marleau J., Lee B. H. Y., E1-Geneidy A. M. Better understanding of factors influencing likelihood of using shared bicycle systems and frequency of use[J]. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2012, (2314): 66-71.
  • 9Fishman E., Washington S., Haworth N. Barriers and facilitators to public bicycle scheme use: A qualitativeapproach[J]. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour, 2012,15 (6): 686-698.
  • 10Maurizio B, Azedine B, Hicham M. Object modeling and pach computation for multimodal travel system [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 175:1705-1730.

共引文献90

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部