树脂直接充填与铸瓷嵌体修复牙体缺损的临床效果分析

Clinical effect analysis of direct resin filling and castable ceramic inlay in restoration of tooth defects

目的 分析树脂直接充填与铸瓷嵌体修复牙体缺损临床效果。方法 100例牙体缺损患者,按随机数字表法分为研究组与对照组,各50例。对照组采用树脂直接充填,研究组采用铸瓷嵌体修复。比较两组临床效果及治疗前后的牙齿叩痛度与牙齿松动度、生活质量评分。结果 研究组临床总有效率92.00%高于对照组的78.00%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,研究组牙齿叩痛度(1.10±0.18)分、牙齿松动度(0.63±0.13)分低于对照组的(1.62±0.34)、(1.02±0.08)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,研究组生活质量评分(89.12±3.47)分高于对照组的(80.41±4.21)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 采用铸瓷嵌体修复牙体缺损效果较好,可减轻患者牙齿叩痛度、牙齿松动度,提高其生活质量。

Objective To analyze the clinical effect of direct resin filling and castable ceramic inlay in restoration of dental defects. Methods A total of 100 patients with tooth defects were randomly divided into the research group and the control group, with 50 patients in each group. The control group received direct resin filling for restoration, and the research group received castable ceramic inlay for restoration. The clinical effect,tooth percussion pain score, tooth loosening score and the quality of life score before and after treatment were compared between the two groups. Results The total clinical effective rate was 92.00% in the research group,which was higher than 78.00% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the tooth percussion pain score(1.10±0.18) points and tooth loosening score(0.63±0.13) points of the research group were lower than(1.62±0.34) and(1.02±0.08) points of the control group, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). After treatment, the quality of life score of the research group was(89.12±3.47) points, which was higher than(80.41±4.21) points of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion Castable ceramic inlay has good effect for restoration of tooth defects, and can reduce the patients’ tooth percussion pain and tooth loosening and improve their quality of life.