腐败感知、政府信任与农民获得感——基于CGSS 2015的实证分析

Corruption Perception, Government Trust and Peasants’ Sense of Acquisition——Empirical Analysis Based on CGSS 2015

党的二十大报告指出“要坚决惩治群众身边的‘蝇贪’”,目标直指基层腐败对群众获得感的吞噬。研究基于CGSS 2015数据,建立结构方程模型,实证分析了腐败感知、政府信任与农民获得感之间的关系及机制。研究发现,农民的腐败感知通过影响政府信任作用于获得感,影响系数为-0.18。具体而言,腐败感知对政府信任存在抑制作用,影响系数为-0.35;政府信任对农民获得感存在促进作用,影响系数为0.54;在腐败感知—政府信任—农民获得感这一影响路径中,政府信任存在部分中介作用,中介效应为-0.19。研究表明,农民对政府工作人员的腐败状况评价越清廉,对政府的信任程度越高,农民经济获得感、政治获得感、民生获得感就越强。这一结论意味着政府应从3个方面提升农民获得感:一是一体推进“不敢腐、不能腐、不想腐”综合发力,铲除腐败产生的土壤和条件;二是在历史比较和国际比较中科学解读我国反腐成效,降低农民腐败感知;三是提升政府透明度及服务质量,增强农民对政府的信任。

The 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China pointed out that “we must resolutely punish the‘Fly Greed’around the masses”, and aimed directly at the devouring of the sense of access to the masses by grassroots corruption. Based on CGSS 2015 data, this research established a structural equation model to study the impact of corruption perception on peasants’ sense of acquisition. It was found that corruption perception had an inhibitory effect on peasants’ sense of acquisition, with an influence coefficient of-0.18. Specifically, corruption perception had an inhibitory effect on government trust, with an influence coefficient of-0.35. The government trust had a positive effect on peasants’ sense of acquisition, and the influence coefficient was 0.54.In the influence path of corruption perception-government trust-peasants’ sense of acquisition, government trust had partial mediating effect, and the mediating effect was-0.19. The research showed that the cleaner the peasants’ evaluation of the corruption status of government workers, the higher peasants’ trust in government, and the stronger peasant’s sense of economic access, political access and livelihood access. This conclusion means that the government should promote the peasants’ sense of access in three aspects.First, it should promote the comprehensive efforts of “not daring to corrupt, not being able to corrupt, and not wanting to corrupt”,to eradicate the soil and conditions of corruption. The second is to scientifically interpret the effectiveness of anti-corruption in our country through historical and international comparison to reduce peasants’ perception of corruption. The third is to improve the government’s transparency and service quality, and enhance peasants’ trust in the government.