期刊文献+

提高重症医学教学查房满意度的教学模式 被引量:1

Survey of ICU teaching rounds:secrets to improve learner satisfaction
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察不同教学模式及其引起的学员情绪负荷与教学满意度之间的关系,以求找到教学效果最大满意化的教学模式。方法通过对入组受试者发放问卷,包括住培医师、进修医师和医学研究生等进行调查,记录受试者一般情况,并要求其记录在查房过程中体验感最强、最希望加强的教学模式,应用Likert量表对每个项目进行评分。同时,记录查房过程中受试者情绪的变化,并用Russel情感模型进行描述,明确不同教学模式及其引起的情绪负荷对查房满意度的影响。结果本研究共收到82名受试者的195份问卷。查房者最常应用的教学模式为基于病理生理学的病情分析和决策制定、基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于临床经验的病情分析和决策制定,占比分别为87.18%、61.54%、55.90%。基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于演讲技巧的病情分析和决策制定、基于循证医学的病情分析和决策制定的频次和程度与受试者对查房的满意度呈显著正相关(r=0.210,P=0.003;r=0.185,P=0.010;r=0.166,P=0.020)。受试者期望加强的教学模式为基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于临床经验的病情分析和决策制定、基于病理生理学的病情分析和决策制定、基于演讲技巧的病情分析和决策制定,占比分别为37.44%、35.38%、27.18%、27.18%。查房时受试者情绪负荷与满意度之间的关系显示,受试者是否感到兴奋与查房满意度呈显著正相关(r=0.244,P=0.001)。结论重症医学的教学查房需要通过不同教学模式进行,基于问题的讨论和反馈、基于演讲技巧的病情分析和决策制定、基于循证医学的病情分析和决策制定可以显著提高受试者对查房的满意度。在查房过程中,学员感受到兴奋的情绪可能提高其满意度。 Objective To examine the different teaching patterns and learners'emotion load to achieve learners satisfaction on rounds.Methods Wenjuanxing was used to recruit participants,including residents,visiting doctors,medical postgraduate students.Baseline characteristics of learners were recorded,and learners were asked to share the top three experiences and emotions during the rounding episode,as well as the expectations of further improvement,and responding to each item using a Likert scale.Learners'emotion during rounding were recorded by Russel model,the relationship between teaching patterns and learners'emotion load to achieve learners,satisfaction on rounds was observed.Results A total of 195 questionnaires were collected from 82 subjects.The most common teaching models used by ward rounds were pathophysiology-based disease analysis and decision making,problem-based discussion and feedback,and clinical experience-based disease analysis and decision making,accounting for 87.18%,61.54%,55.90%,respectively.The frequency and degree of problem-based discussion and feedback,condition analysis and decision making based on presentation skills,and condition analysis and decision making based on evidence-based medicine were significantly positively correlated with the subjects'satisfaction with ward rounds(r=0.210,P=0.003;r=0.185,P=0.010;r=0.166,P=0.020).The subjects expected to strengthen discussion and feedback based on problems,analysis and decision making based on clinical experience,pathophysiology-based disease analysis and decision making,condition analysis and decision making based on presentation skills,the proportions were 37.44%,35.38%,27.18%,27.18%,respectively.The relationship between emotional load and satisfaction during ward rounds showed that whether the subjects felt excited was positively correlated with satisfaction during ward rounds(r=0.244,P=0.001).Conclusions Different teaching patterns should be performed in ICU teaching rounds.Problem-based discussion and feedback,interesting and storytelling presentation,evidence-based medicine may significantly improve the learners'satisfaction with emotion of excited.
作者 徐静媛 陈辉 谢波 刘玲 杨毅 Jingyuan Xu;Hui Chen;Bo Xie;Ling Liu;YiYang(Department of Critical Care Medicine,Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Critical Care Medicine,Zhongda Hospital,School of Medicine,Southeast University,Nanjing 210009,China)
出处 《中华重症医学电子杂志》 CSCD 2022年第3期248-252,共5页 Chinese Journal Of Critical Care & Intensive Care Medicine(Electronic Edition)
基金 全国医学教育发展中心医学模拟教育研究项目(2021MNZC18) 南京市卫生科技发展专项资金资助项目教育管理类课题 东南大学附属中大医院住院医师规范化培训全国重点专业基地开放课题(ZDZYJD-JZ-2022-6) 东南大学附属中大医院临床教学改革研究与实践项目 东南大学课程思政教育教学改革与研究实践项目。
关键词 教学查房 教学模式 满意度 Teaching rounds Teaching patterns Satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1王今达,王宝恩.多脏器功能失常综合征(MODS)病情分期诊断及严重程度评分标准(经庐山’95全国危重病急救医学学术会讨论通过)[J].中国危重病急救医学,1995,7(6):346-347. 被引量:1421
  • 2Fry D E,Pearlstein L,Fulton R L,et al.Multiple system organ failure,the role of uncontrolled infection[J].Arch Surg,1980,115(2):136-140.
  • 3Levy M M,Fink M P,Marshall J C,et al.2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS international sepsis definitions conference[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31(4):1250-1256.
  • 4Marshall J C,Cook D J,Christou N V,et al.Multiple organ dysfunction score:a reliable descriptor of a complex clinical outcome[J].Crit Care Med,1995,23(10):1638-1652.
  • 5Bone R C,Balk R A,Cerra F B,et al.The ACCP/SCCM consensus conference committee:definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guideline for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis[J].Chest,1992,101(6):1644-1655.
  • 6Doig C J,Zygun D A,Fick G H,et al.Study of clinical course of organ dysfunction in intensive care[J].Crit Care Med,2004,32(2):384-390.
  • 7Padkin A,Goldfrad C,Brady A R,et al.Epidemiology of severe sepsis occurring in the first 24 hrs in intensive care units in England,Wales,and Northern Ireland[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31(9):2332-2338.
  • 8Angus D C,Linde-Zwirble W T,Lidicker J,et al.Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States:analysis of incidence,outcome,and associated costs care[J].Crit Care Med,2001,29(2):1303-1310.
  • 9Weycker D,Akhras K S,Edelsberg J,et al.Long-term mortality and medical care charges in patiens with severe sepsis[J].Crit Care Med,2003,31(9):2316-2323.
  • 10杜斌,陈德昌,刘大为,席修明,陈惠德,杨乃众,杜新建,暨北京市危重病医学临床研究协作组ICU.感染相关的器官衰竭评分对多器官功能障碍综合征预后判断的意义[J].中华医学杂志,2001,81(2):78-81. 被引量:78

共引文献96

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部