摘要
我国学界在中国是否应当引入竞争中性以及应当如何引入竞争中性问题上存在的理论分歧,很大程度上源于竞争中性与中国体制之间不可调适的“虚假悖论”,这一悖论源于对竞争中性适用和豁免理论基础的认知缺失。公平理论、效率理论和国家理论为竞争中性在全球范围的广泛适用提供了正当性,公共利益理论为豁免竞争中性和维护地方价值保留了灵活空间。打破竞争中性存在“国际标准版本”的错觉,打造和实施“中国版本”的竞争中性,有助于中国和中国企业在国际社会占据法理和商业伦理高点。
The theoretical differences in China’s academic circles on whether and how to introduce competitive neutrality in China stem to a large extent from the “false paradox” that competition neutrality is not coordinated with the Chinese system, which stems from the lack of understanding of the theoretical basis of competitive neutrality and exemption. Fairness, efficiency and national theories provide legitimacy for the widespread application of competitive neutrality on a global scale, and public interest theory leaves room for immunity from competitive neutrality and the preservation of local values. Breaking the illusion of an “international standard version” in competitive neutrality and creating and implementing a “Chinese version” of competitive neutrality will help Chinese and Chinese enterprises occupy the high ground of jurisprudence and business ethics in the international community.
作者
李俊峰
LI Jun-feng(Law School,Shanghai University,Shanghai 200444,China)
出处
《北京联合大学学报(人文社会科学版)》
北大核心
2023年第1期109-116,共8页
Journal of Beijing Union University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
国家社会科学基金项目“竞争中性的中国规制体系研究”(项目编号:19BFX162)。
关键词
竞争中性
适用
豁免
中国
competitive neutrality
applicable
exemptions
China