期刊文献+

考虑低碳宣传水平的供应链成本共担契约研究

Study on Supply Chain Cost Sharing Contract Considering Low Carbon Propaganda Level
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文分析了一个二级供应链中零售商的低碳宣传问题,构建了一个制造商对零售商低碳宣传费用进行补贴的成本共担契约模型,通过引入拉格朗日函数K-T条件,得到最大低碳宣传水平和非最大宣传水平下的最优解和契约达成的有效区间,并分析了各影响因素对两种情况下最优解及有效区间的影响。研究发现,成本共担契约能否达成取决于消费者低碳宣传敏感度和零售商的边际利润,零售商的边际利润较大时,可实现最大低碳宣传水平下的成本共担契约,零售商的边际利润较小时,可实现非最大低碳宣传水平下的成本共担契约;零售商最大低碳宣传水平下有效区间范围与低碳宣传成本系数以及最大低碳宣传水平负相关,与消费者低碳宣传敏感度以及制造商低碳产品边际利润正相关,零售商非最大宣传水平下则相反。最后通过MATLAB仿真模拟验证了模型的正确性和有效性。 The retailer’s low-carbon propaganda problem in a two-stage supply chain is analyzed, and a cost-sharing contract model for manufacturer to subsidize retailer’s low-carbon propaganda cost is established.By introducing the Lagrange function K-T condition, the optimal solution and the effective interval of the contract are obtained under the maximum low-carbon propaganda level and the non-maximum propaganda level, and the influence of various factors on the optimal solution and the effective interval are analyzed.It is found that whether the cost-sharing contract can be reached depends on the sensitivity of consumers to low-carbon propaganda and the marginal profit of retailers.When the marginal profit of retailer is large, the cost-sharing contract under the maximum low-carbon propaganda level can be realized, and when the marginal profit of retailer is small, the cost-sharing contract under non-maximum low-carbon propaganda level can be realized.The effective range under the maximum low-carbon propaganda level is negatively correlated with the cost coefficient of low-carbon propaganda and the maximum low-carbon propaganda le-vel, and is positively correlated with the consumers’ sensitivity of low-carbon propaganda and the marginal profit of manufacturers.The effective range under non-maximum low-carbon propaganda level is reverse.Finally, the correctness and effectiveness of the model are verified by MATLAB simulation.
作者 缪文清 沈炳良 Miao Wenqing;Shen Bingliang(Department of Business Administration,Shanghai University of Finance&Economics Zhejiang College,Jinhua 321013,China;Department of Foundation,Shanghai University of Finance&Economics Zhejiang College,Jinhua 321013,China)
出处 《工业技术经济》 北大核心 2023年第2期16-27,共12页 Journal of Industrial Technological Economics
基金 2020年上海财经大学浙江学院发展基金项目“碳交易机制下低碳补贴对供应链减排及定价的影响分析”(项目编号:2020GR003) 2021年上海财经大学浙江学院发展基金项目“考虑低碳宣传水平的供应链成本共担契约研究”(项目编号:2021GR005)。
关键词 低碳宣传 成本分担契约 供应链减排 最大低碳宣传水平 消费者敏感度 边际利润 low-carbon propaganda cost sharing contract supply chain emission reduction maximum low-carbon propaganda level consumer sensitivity marginal profit
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

二级参考文献203

  • 1王迎军.顾客需求驱动的供应链契约问题综述[J].管理科学学报,2005,8(2):68-76. 被引量:60
  • 2王磊,梁樑,吴德胜,熊立.零售商竞争下的垂直合作广告模型[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(2):63-69. 被引量:48
  • 3顾巧论,高铁杠,石连栓.基于博弈论的逆向供应链定价策略分析[J].系统工程理论与实践,2005,25(3):20-25. 被引量:208
  • 4张庶萍,张世英.基于微分对策的供应链合作广告决策研究[J].控制与决策,2006,21(2):153-157. 被引量:31
  • 5Davis R A.Retailers open doors wide for co-op[J].Advertising Age,1994,65(32):30-30.
  • 6Somers T M,Gupta Y P,Herriott S R.Analysis of cooperative advertising expenditures:A transfer-function modeling approach[J].Journal of Advertising Research,1990,30(5):35-45.
  • 7Top 100 advertisers[N].Advertising Age,1999-09-17.16.
  • 8Bergen M,John G.Understanding cooperative advertising participation rates in conventional channels[J].Journal of Marketing Research,1997,34(3):357-369.
  • 9Huang Z M,Li S X.Co-op advertising models in manufacturer-retailer supply chains:A game theory approach[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2001,135(3):527-544.
  • 10Yue J F,Austin J,Wang M.Coordination of cooperative advertising in a two-level supply chain when manufacturer offers discount[J].European Journal of Operational Research,2006,168(1):65-85.

共引文献391

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部