摘要
交叉审读是提高期刊质量的一种审读方法,广泛应用于科技类期刊。在社科类期刊中,交叉审读的开展也同样具有积极意义。交叉审读在社科类期刊中的规范适用是一个重要的命题,交叉审读是独立于三审制的“审读”,交叉审读的属性具有三重维度,交叉审读是一种依托于互补学习的成长方式。源头治理与过程治理相结合的程序性优化路径、编辑与作者协作共赢的技能性优化路径以及明晰责任与不吝惩戒的制度性优化路径,为交叉审读的未来发展提供了可行性。
Proof-reading is a kind of review method to improve the quality of journals,which is widely used in science and technology journals.In social science journals,the development of proof-reading also has positive significance.The standard application of cross-review in social science journals is an important proposition,which mainly includes cross-review independent of the three-review system,cross-review's three dimensions,and cross-review as a growth mode relying on complementary learning.The procedural optimization path combining source governance and process governance,the technical optimization path combining win-win editor and author cooperation,and the institutional optimization path clarifying responsibility and not sparing punishment provide feasible optimization paths for the future development of proof-reading.
作者
刘慧
LIU Hui(Editorial Department of Journal of China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088,China)
出处
《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》
2023年第1期100-105,共6页
Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
关键词
交叉审读
社科类期刊
“三审三校”制度
规范适用
路径优化
proof-reading
social science journals
three review and three proofreading
standard application
path optimization