期刊文献+

高校新教师岗前集中培训效果的评价与影响因素研究 被引量:2

Study on the Effect and Influencing Factors of Pre-job Training for Novice College Teachers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 借助柯氏培训评价理论,建立一个包含满意度、获得感和适切性等三个维度的高校新教师岗前集中培训效果的评价量表。通过对参加2013-2018年上海市市属高校新教师岗前培训教师的调查,获得了高校新教师岗前集中培训的评价结果,并对影响评价结果的影响因素进行分析。结果显示,高校新教师岗前培训获得教师认可;助教经历、参训年度和学科不同的教师对培训评价呈现显著性差异。采用多元回归分析影响因素发现,助教经历、参训年度、培训内容、培训专家、重点专业、共同体支持、教学压力、科研压力对培训效果存在显著性影响。研究建议,要采用统一标准实施培训和做好培训评价,为教师在培训前提供助教经历、足够的教学共同体支持和教学成长空间。 With the help of Kirkpatrick’s training evaluation theory, an evaluation scale of pre-job training effect of new teachers in colleges and universities is established, which includes three dimensions: satisfaction, acquisition and appropriateness. Through the investigation of participating teachers, the evaluation results are obtained, and the influencing factors of the evaluation results are analyzed. The results show that the pre-job traininghas been recognized by teachers, and teachers with different teaching assistant experience, training year and discipline show significant differences in training evaluation. Multiple regression analysis is used to find that teaching assistant experience, training year, training content, training experts, key majors, community support, teaching pressure, and scientific research pressure have a significant impact on the training effect. The research suggests that uniform standards should be used to carry out training and do a good job in training evaluation, and provide teachers with teaching assistant experience, sufficient teaching community support and teaching growth space before training.
作者 朱炎军 ZHU Yan-jun(Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai 201620,China)
出处 《黑龙江高教研究》 北大核心 2023年第1期91-96,共6页 Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
关键词 高校 新教师 岗前培训 评价 colleges and universities novice teachers pre-job training evaluate
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献31

  • 1王鹏,杨化冬,时勘.培训迁移效果影响因素的初步研究[J].心理科学,2002,25(1):69-72. 被引量:54
  • 2KUCSERA J V, SVINICKI M. Rigorous evaluations of faculty development programs [J]. The Journal of Faculty Development, 2010, 24(2): 5-18.
  • 3HINES S R. Investigating faculty program assessment practices: what's being done and how can it be improved? [J]. The Journal of Faculty Development, 2009, 23(3): 5-19.
  • 4STES A, MIN-LELIVELD M, GIJBELS D, VAN PETEGEM P. The impact of instructional development in higher education: The state-of-the-art of the research [J]. Educational Research Review, 2010, 5(1): 25-49.
  • 5DIXON K, SCOTT S. The evaluation of an off-shore professional development programme as part of the university's strategic plan: A case study approach[J]. Quality in Higher Education, 2003, 25(2): 63-80.
  • 6GIBBS G, COFFEY M. The impact of training of university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students [J]. Active Learning in Higher Education, 2004, 5(1): 87-100.
  • 7许甜.我国高校教师教学行为的差异初探--基于学科的视角.2012年文化传承创新与建设高等教育强国国际论坛论文集[EB/OL].(2013-12-01)[2014-02-08].http://www.hie.edu.cn/old/zhuanti(xin)/zhuanti2012927/4-6.html.
  • 8LINDBLOM-YLANNE S, TRIGWELL K, NEVGI A, ASHWIN P. How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 2006, 31(3): 285-298.
  • 9BUTCHER J, STONCEL D. The impact of a postgraduate certificate in teaching in higher education on university lecturers appointed for their professional expertise at a teaching-led university: 'It's made me braver' [J]. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2012, 17 (2): 149-162.
  • 10GIBBS G. Reflections on the changing nature of educational development[J]. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2012, 18(1): 4-14.

共引文献52

同被引文献37

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部