期刊文献+

社会存在、警惕性及信息卷入度对个体事实核查的影响 被引量:1

The Effect of Social Presence, Vigilance and Information Involvement on Individual Fact-checking Behavior
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对个体对网络新媒体环境中因难以确定信息真假而采取的事实核查行为,研究了社会存在、警惕性及信息卷入度这三个因素对个体事实核查频率的影响。采用三因子混合设计实验研究,被试在不同的警惕性条件与社会存在条件下完成事实核查任务,测量指标包括对所给陈述的判断与自信水平。结果表明,社会存在降低了个体核查事实的可能性,瞬时警惕性的提升则削弱了社会存在的影响。此外,个体对高卷入度信息的事实核查比对低卷入度信息少。研究结果拓展了新媒体环境中的信息事实核查理论,可为信息的推送设计方式提供借鉴。 Aiming at the fact-checking behavior of ambiguous information in the new media environment, this paper studies the effect of social presence, vigilance and information involvement on the frequency of fact checking. A three-factor mixed designed experiment was used. The participants completed the fact-check task under different vigilance and social presence conditions, while the study measured the judgment of the given statements and the confidence level of the participants. The results show that social presence reduces the possibility of individual fact-checking, and the inducement of momentary vigilance weakens the impact of social presence. Individuals have less fact-checking possibility on information with high involvement than those with low involvement. The research results expand the information fact checking theory in the new media environment andprovide reference for the design of information push.
作者 王喆诚 于瑞峰 WANG Zhecheng;YU Ruifeng(Department of Industrial Engineering,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
出处 《心理技术与应用》 2023年第1期42-49,共8页 Psychology(Techniques and Applications)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71771134)。
关键词 事实核查 社会存在 警惕性 信息卷入度 fact-checking social presence vigilance information involvement
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献41

  • 1李纾 房永青.《新加坡21》对双语青年学生的决策影响[J].(香港)青年研究学报,2002,5(2):162-162.
  • 2Teigen K H,Brun W.Verbal probabilities:A question of frame? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2003,16:53~72
  • 3Koriat A,Lichtenstein S,Fischhoff B.Reasons for confidence.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Human Learning and Memory,1980,6:107~118
  • 4Larrick,R P.Motivational factors in decision theories:The role of self-protection.Psychological Bulletin,1993,113:440~450
  • 5Soll J B.Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration:The roles of random error and ecological structure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,65:117~137
  • 6Soll J B.Determinants of overconfidence and miscalibration:The roles of random error and ecological structure.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996,65:117~137
  • 7uantak L,Bolger F,Ferrell W R.The hard-easy effect in subjective probability calibration.Organizational Behavior and Human Decisiton Processes,1996,67:201~221
  • 8Juslin P.The overconfidence phenomenon as a consequence of informal experimenter-guided selection of almanac items.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process,1994,57:226~246
  • 9Juslin P,Olsson H,Bjorkman M.Brunswikian and Thurstonian origins of bias in probability assessment:on the interpretation of stochastic components of judgment.Journal of Behavior Decision Making,1997
  • 10Buehler R,Griffin D,Ross M.Exploring the ‘planning fallacy’:Why people underestimate their task completion time.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1994,67:366~381

共引文献49

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部