期刊文献+

叠加高频喷射通气与间歇性正压通气在鼻内窥镜鼻窦手术中的应用 被引量:2

Application of high frequency jet ventilation and intermittent positive pressure ventilation in endoscopic sinus surgery
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较叠加高频喷射通气(SHFJV)与间歇性正压通气(IPPV)对功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)患者外科术野质量的影响。方法选择行FESS的患者80例,男49例,女31例,年龄18~64岁,BMI 19~30 kg/m^(2),ASAⅠ—Ⅲ级。采用随机数字表法将患者分为两组:SHFJV组(SH组)和IPPV组(IP组),每组40例。记录术中晶体液、胶体液、红细胞(RBC)、新鲜冰冻血浆(FFP)、出血量、尿量、血管活性药(硝酸甘油、去甲肾上腺素)用量和手术时间。手术期间每15分钟记录HR、MAP、心脏指数(CI)、心率血压乘积(RPP)和外科术野质量评分,记算平均值。记录插管即刻、鼻内窥镜置入后1、2 h、术毕时pH、PaO_(2)、PaCO_(2)、SpO_(2)、乳酸(Lac)、碱剩余(BE)、Hb。记录术后3 d内寒战、低血压、恶心呕吐、发热、睡眠障碍、手术部位感染和肺部感染发生情况。结果与IP组比较,SH组晶体液、胶体液、RBC输注量、出血量、RPP明显减少(P<0.01),外科术野质量评分明显降低(P<0.01),置入后1、2 h pH明显降低,PaCO_(2)、BE和Hb明显升高(P<0.05),术毕时PaCO_(2)、BE和Hb明显升高(P<0.05),术后3 d内低血压、恶心呕吐发生率明显降低(P<0.05)。两组寒战、发热、睡眠障碍和肺部感染发生率差异无统计学意义。两组无一例手术部位感染。结论与间歇性正压通气比较,叠加高频喷射通气可减少功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术患者术中出血量,提高外科术野质量,减少术后低血压、恶心呕吐等并发症,可安全有效地用于临床。 Objective To compare the effects of superposition high-frequency jet ventilation(SHFJV)and intermittent positive pressure ventilation(IPPV)on surgical field quality in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery(FESS).Methods Eighty patients,49 males and 31 females,aged 18-64 years,BMI 19-30 kg/m^(2),ASA physical statusⅠ-Ⅲ,who underwent FESS were selected.The patients were randomly divided into SHFJV group(group SH)and IPPV group(group IP),40 cases in each group.Intraoperative crystalloid fluid,colloidal fluid,red blood cell(RBC),fresh frozen plasma(FFP),blood loss,urine volume,vasoactive drugs(nitroglycerin,norepinephrine)during maintenance,operation time were recorded.HR,MAP,cardiac index(CI),heart rate and blood pressure product(RPP),and surgical field quality scores were recorded every 15 minutes during surgery.pH,PaO_(2),PaCO_(2),SpO_(2),lactate(Lac),alkali surplus(BE),and Hb were recorded immediately after intubation,1 hour,2 hours after nasal endoscopy insertion,and at the end of operation.The incidence of chills,hypotension,nausea and vomiting,fever,sleep disorders,surgical site infection and pulmonary infection within 3 days after operation were recorded.Results Compared with group IP,the amount of blood loss,crystalloid fluid,colloid fluid,RBC infusion volume and RPP in group SH were significantly decreased(P<0.01),the surgical field quality score was significantly decreased(P<0.01),the pH was significantly decreased 1 hour,2 hours after implantation,and the PaCO_(2),BE,and Hb were significantly increased(P<0.05).PaCO_(2),BE,and Hb were significantly increased at the end of operation(P<0.05),and the incidence of hypotension,nausea and vomiting were significantly decreased within 3 days after operation(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in the incidence of chills,fever,sleep disturbance and pulmonary infection between the two groups.There was no infection of surgical incision in the two groups.ConclusionCompared with intermittent positive pressure ventilation,superposition high-frequency jet ventilation can reduce intraoperative blood loss,improve surgical field quality,reduce postoperative complications such as hypotension,nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery,which is safe and effective in clinical practice.
作者 张静 盛崴宣 缪慧慧 乔辉 ZHANG Jing;SHENG Weixuan;MIAO Huihui;QIAO Hui(Departemnt of Anes-thesiology,Beijing Shijitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100038,China)
出处 《临床麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2022年第11期1172-1176,共5页 Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology
基金 北京市医院管理中心青年人才培养“青苗”计划(QML20200102)。
关键词 功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术 外科术野质量 叠加高频喷射通气 出血 间歇性正压通气 Functional endoscopic sinus surgery Quality of surgical field High frequency jet ventilation Hemorrhage Intermittent positive pressure ventilation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献62

  • 1邱前辉,黄宏明,龚穗清,吴小琴,郑丽芬,陈少华,张思毅.鼻息肉鼻窦炎患者家族性发病的临床调查[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,20(20):944-945. 被引量:3
  • 2古庆家,安惠民,刘亚峰,周光耀,梁传余.鼻内镜手术治疗青少年及儿童慢性鼻窦炎[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2004,11(4):231-232. 被引量:11
  • 3时光刚,李秀国,王昭迪.慢性鼻-鼻窦炎鼻息肉内镜手术严重并发症分析[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42(1):19-22. 被引量:61
  • 4李佩华,胡秉德.鼻内镜手术治疗儿童慢性鼻窦炎36例[J].临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,21(12):560-561. 被引量:2
  • 5瞿申红,李添应,李敏,史剑波,文卫平,文卫华.鼻息肉的遗传流行病学研究[J].中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2007,42(8):608-611. 被引量:4
  • 6Meinhold-Heerlein I, Fotopoulou C, Harter P, et al. Statement by the Kommission Ovar of the AGO: The New FIGO and WHO Classifications of Ovarian, Fallopian Tube and Primary Peritoneal Cancer. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd, 2015,75 (10): 1021-1027.
  • 7Topgtil K, Cetinkaya MB, Cigdem Arslan N, et al. Cytore- ductive surgery (SRC) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treatment of peritoneal carcino- matosis: Our initial experience and technical details. Ulus Cerrahi Derg, 2015,31 (3) : 138-147.
  • 8Ripoll? s-Melchor J, Espinosa A, Martinez-Hurtado E, et al. Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy in non- cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth, 2016,28 :105-115.
  • 9Joshi GP, Kehlet H. CON: Perioperative Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy Is an Essential Element of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol? Anesth Analg, 2016,122 (5) : 1261-1263.
  • 10Khoronenko VE, Shemetova MM, Drozhzhina OV, et al. An- aesthesia and intensive care during intraoperative intraperito- neal hyperthermic chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer (literature review and own clinical experience). Anest- eziol Reanimatol,2015,60(1):50-54.

共引文献1334

同被引文献22

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部