期刊文献+

新型与传统接骨板固定股骨远端骨折的生物力学比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Biomechanics between New and Traditional LCP Fixation of Distal Femoral Fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对比新型与传统接骨板(Locking Compression Plate,LCP)固定股骨远端骨折的生物力学情况,为选择接骨板提供理论依据。应用有限元分析选择步态运动时的载荷作为约束条件,分析接骨板的变形、应力及骨痂的变形情况,发现在步态情况下,传统接骨板的最大应力是新型的1.8倍,最大变形是新型的2.9倍。使用新型接骨板固定股骨远端骨折失效性远小于传统LCP,拥有更好的生物力学性能。 Objective To compare the biomechanics of locking compression plate(LCP) for distal femoral fracture and provide theoretical basis for the selection of locking compression plate. Methods Finite element analysis was used to analyze the deformation, stress and callus deformation of the bone plate. Results Under the condition of gait, the maximum stress and deformation of the traditional plate were 1.8 times and 2.9 times higher than that of the new one. Conclusion The failure rate of the new plate is much lower than that of the traditional LCP, and it has better biomechanical properties.
作者 赵建波 李世芸 熊鹰 黄子毅 Zhao Jianbo;Li Shiyun;Xiong Ying;Huang Ziyi(Kunming University of Science and Technology,Kunming 650500,Yunnan,China;Department of Orthopedics,Kunming Yan'an Hospital,Kunming 650510,Yunnan,China;Yunnan Opus Medical Technology Co.,Ltd.,Kunming 650510,Yunnan,China)
出处 《农业装备与车辆工程》 2023年第1期113-116,共4页 Agricultural Equipment & Vehicle Engineering
关键词 股骨远端 锁定加压板 有限元分析 生物力学 distal femur locking compression plate finite element analysis biomechanics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献43

  • 1赵宝林,罗民,马洪顺.国人股骨下端松质骨力学性质实验研究[J].北京生物医学工程,2004,23(2):143-146. 被引量:14
  • 2徐秀林,薛文东,戴克戎.正常人皮质骨压缩力学性能实验研究[J].医用生物力学,1996,11(1):26-29. 被引量:9
  • 3Schwab J M, Chiang N, Arita M, et al. Resolvin El and protectin D1 activate inflammation-resolution programmes[J]. Nature, 2009, 447(13): 869-874.
  • 4Linde F. The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone[J]. J. Biomech, 1993, 10: 1249-1252.
  • 5Snyder S M, Schneider E. Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography [J]. JOrthop. Res., 1991, 9: 422-431.
  • 6Lotz J C. Mechanical properties of tralaeeular hone from the proximal femur: a quantitative CT study [J]. JComput Assist Tomogr, 1990, 14(1): 108.
  • 7Keaveny T M, Borchers R E. Trabecular bone modulus and strength can depend on specimen geometry[J]. J Biomech, 1993, 26(8): 991-1000.
  • 8Helgason B, Perilli E, Schileo E, et al. Mathematical relationships between bone density and mechanical properties: a literature review [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2008, 23(2): 135 146.
  • 9Harrigan T P, Jasty M, Mann R W, et al. Limitations of the continuum assumption in cancellous bone[J]. J Biomeeh, 1988: 269-275.
  • 10Garrison J G, Slahoch C L. have greater effects on the bone than damage[J]. Bone, Density and architecture toughness of trabecular 2009, 44(5): 924-9.

共引文献31

同被引文献15

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部