期刊文献+

能量管理策略与员工工作结果关系的潜在剖面分析

Latent Profile Analysis on the Association of Energy Management Strategies with Work Outcomes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于努力-恢复模型和自我损耗理论,运用潜在剖面分析(LPA),对企业中522名员工在工作中的能量管理策略类型进行了划分,并进一步对采用不同类型能量管理策略的员工在工作幸福感和工作绩效方面的异质性进行检验.研究表明,员工在工作中使用的能量管理策略包括回避能量使用型、工作能量使用型、休闲能量使用型和积极能量使用型4种类型.相比较而言,工作能量使用型和积极能量使用型员工的工作幸福感和工作绩效水平最高,且在结果上没有显著差异,休闲能量使用型次之,回避能量使用型最低. Based on the effort-recovery model and ego depletion theory,latent profile analysis(LPA)was used to classify 522 employees into different types of energy management strategies at work,and further analyze the differences of employees adopting different types of energy management strategies in terms of workplace well-being and work performance.It was shown that employees’energy management strategies can be divided into four types,i.e.,avoidant-energy users,work-energy users,casual-energy users and positive-energy users.Furthermore,employees classified as work-energy users and positive-energy users have the highest level of workplace well-being and work performance,and there is no significant difference in the outcomes of the two types,casual-energy users have the middle level of workplace well-being and work performance,and avoidant-energy users have the lowest level of workplace well-being and work performance among the four types.
作者 张兰霞 贾媛媛 代广松 毛孟雨 ZHANG Lan-xia;JIA Yuan-yuan;DAI Guang-song;MAO Meng-yu(School of Business Administration,Northeastern University,Shenyang 110169,China)
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2023年第1期138-144,共7页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71972032).
关键词 工间微休息 工作相关策略 工作幸福感 工作绩效 潜在剖面分析 micro-break work-related strategy workplace well-being work performance latent profile analysis(LPA)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献39

  • 1王雁飞,郭湘莹,朱瑜.基于资源保存理论视角的组织德性对挑战型组织公民行为影响机制研究[J].管理学报,2020,0(1):50-57. 被引量:9
  • 2Cambell JP, Mchenry JJ, Wise LL.Modeling job performance in population of jobs[J]. Personnel Psychology, 1990,43:313.
  • 3Motowildlo SJ, Borman WC,Schmit MJ. A theory of individual difference in task performance and contextual performance[J]. Human Performance, 1997,10(2):71-83.
  • 4Borman WC,Motowildlo SJ. Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance[A]. Personnel seletion in organization[M], San Francisco, CA: JoSEY-Bass,1993.82.
  • 5Neal A,Griffin MA. Developing a model of individual performance for human resource management[J]. Aisa Pacific Journal of Human Resource,1999,37(2):44-59.
  • 6Spangenberg HH. Performance management-problems and possible solutions[J].Journal of Industrial Psychology, 1994,20:1-6.
  • 7Austin JT, Villanova P. The criterion problem:1917-1992[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,1992,77:836-834.
  • 8Motowildlo SJ,Van Scotter, JR. Evidence that task performance should be distinguished from contextual performance[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994,79(4):475-480.
  • 9Campbell JP, McCloy RA, Oppler SH, et al. A theory of performance. In Schmitt N, Borman WC. Personnel selection in organizations[M]. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass,1993.35-70.
  • 10Conway JM. Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1999,84(1):3-13.

共引文献250

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部