期刊文献+

层次分析模型在房地一体权籍调查评价中的应用 被引量:2

Application of Analytic Hierarchy Process Model in Survey and Evaluation of Real Estate and Land Ownership
下载PDF
导出
摘要 不动产权籍调查成果质量评价方法中存在大量的定性和定量指标,本研究采用层次分析模糊综合特征建立评价模型,对影响成果质量因素进行层次分析,将复杂问题简单化,对影响因子采用熵权法和专家打分法等级定权,实践验证能快速、科学、精准评价测绘产品质量,相比传统不动产权籍调查成果质量评价工作效率提高70%以上,本研究取得评价方法对目前全国正在开展的不动产权籍调查评价具有较好指导意义。 There are a lot of qualitative and quantitative indexes in the quality evaluation of the survey results of real property ownership, and this study conducts AHP for the factors that affect the quality of results, and simplifies complex issues. Using the fuzzy comprehensive grading to determine the impact factor, the practice verification can quickly, scientifically and accurately evaluate the quality of surveying and mapping products, and the efficiency is increased by more than 70% compared with the traditional methods. The method serves as a good guidance for the investigation and evaluation of the integrated ownership of rural real estate carried out in China.
作者 杨萍 王新鹏 YANG Ping;WANG Xinpeng(Guizhou Province Surveying and Mapping Product Quality Supervision and Inspection Station,Guiyang 550001,China;College of Mining,Guizhou University,Guiyang 550025,China)
出处 《贵州大学学报(自然科学版)》 2023年第1期38-41,47,共5页 Journal of Guizhou University:Natural Sciences
基金 贵州省山地低空数字航空摄影质量检查与验收项目(2019133)。
关键词 房地一体 权籍调查 元素 层次分析 模糊综合评价 integration of real estate and land title investigation elements analytic hierarchy process fuzzy comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1李家军,杨莉.对隶属函数确定方法的进一步探讨[J].贵州工业大学学报(自然科学版),2004,33(6):1-4. 被引量:21
  • 2胡圣武,王新洲,潘正风,陶本藻.GIS中的模糊不确定性以及处理方法[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版),2005,30(5):417-420. 被引量:16
  • 3马维野.一种检验判断矩阵次序一致性的实用方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,1996,16(11):103-105. 被引量:20
  • 4许树柏.层次分析法原理[M].天津大学出版社,1988..
  • 5Saaty T L. Modeling unstructured decision problems-the theory of analytical hierarchies [J]. Math Comput Simulation, 1978, 20:147- 158.
  • 6Xu Shubai.Theory of the Analytical Hierarchy Process[M].Tianjin:Tianjin University Publishing House,1986.
  • 7Kwiesielewicz M,Uden E.Inconsistent and contradictory judgments in pairwise comparison method in the AHP[J].Computers &Operations Research,2004,31 (5):713-719.
  • 8Karapetrovic S,Rosenbloom E.A quality control approach to consistency paradoxes in AHP[J].European Journal of Operational Research,1999,119(3):704-718.
  • 9Finan J,Hurley W.A note on a method to ensure rank-order consistency in the analytic hierarchy process[J].International Transactions in Operational Research,1996,3(1):99-103.
  • 10韩光文,韩松.差异判断层次分析法[J].华中理工大学学报,1997,25(8):1-4. 被引量:4

共引文献368

同被引文献21

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部