中国高等教育实证研究的考察与分析——基于四种中外权威期刊的比较

The Research of Empirical Research on Higher Education in China--Based on the Comparison of Four Authoritative Journals in China and Foreign Countries

近年来,中国教育研究领域掀起了实证研究热潮,高等教育研究也深受教育实证研究热的影响。本研究选取中国高等教育学会高等教育学专业委员会会刊《高等教育研究》作为研究文本,同时选取一种国际高等教育权威刊物和两种其他学科权威刊物作为比较文本,采用统计法、内容分析法、比较法,深入考察中国高等教育实证研究的基本情况,以期为提升高等教育实证研究的质量提供参考。研究发现,尽管高等教育实证研究取得了巨大进步,但与其他研究领域相比,存在着实证研究的使用频率较低、量化研究以及混合研究的使用频率较低、实证研究内容较为单一、实证研究规范性较弱等问题。未来,在积极促进高等教育实证研究的同时,更要规范高等教育实证研究,促进多种研究范式的共存共融,发挥高等教育实证研究的本土性和学科性。

In recent years,there has been an upsurge of empirical research in the field of education research in China,and higher education research has also been deeply affected by the enthusiasm of education empirical research.This study selected the Journal of Higher Education Association and Higher Education Professional Committee in China“Higher Education Research”as the sample,and selects one international higher education authoritative publication and two other academic authoritative publications as the comparative text,and used statistical methods,content analysis methods,and comparative methods to thoroughly investigate the present situation of empirical research on higher education in China,to enhance the quality of empirical research on higher education in China.The research found that the great progress made in empirical research of higher education,however,compared with other research fields,empirical research was used less frequently,quantitative research and mixed research were also used less frequently,the content of empirical research was relatively single,and the standardization of empirical research was weak.In the future,it is necessary to standardize the empirical research of higher education when actively promoting the empirical research of higher education,promote the coexistence of multiple research paradigms,and give play to the locality and discipline of empirical research in higher education.