期刊文献+

危重患者采用连续性血液滤过治疗中采用枸缘酸钠与肝素的抗凝效果比较

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨危重患者去甲肾上腺素采用连续性血液滤的应用效果。方法:研究对象为2019.10—2020.10月在我院ICU收治的80例危重患者,全部患者采取连续静脉-静脉血液滤过(CVVH)治疗,根据用药方式的不同将其分为枸橼酸纳组和肝素抗凝组,两组均为40例,比较两组凝血功能、血常规水平。结果:肝素的用量与APACHEⅡ评分表现为负相关关系,分数越高药物用量越低,30~39分与40~49分患者用量与0~19分差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。枸缘酸钠用量与APACHEⅡ评分无关联(P>0.05)。枸缘酸钠组治疗前后凝血酶原时间、活化部分凝血活酶时间及纤维蛋白原比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);肝素抗凝组治疗前后各项指标相比差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05),治疗后两组凝血酶原时间及活化部分凝血活酶时间差异存在统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前后两组pH值均处于正常范围内,枸缘酸钠组治疗前后pH值无统计学差异(P>0.05)。肝素抗凝组治疗后pH值高于治疗前(P>0.05),两组治疗前后白细胞、红细胞压积无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论:危重患者采取连续性血液滤过治疗中采用肝素和枸橼酸纳均具有良好的效果,其中枸橼酸对存在出血风险危重患者应用效果更佳,肝素抗凝具有良好的抗凝效果,能够满足治疗要求,临床需要结合实际合理选择药物。
出处 《北方药学》 2022年第10期179-181,共3页 Journal of North Pharmacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献68

  • 1陶晓根,王锦权,承韶辉,赵劲松.连续性血液净化治疗对脓毒症患者凝血功能的影响[J].中国急救医学,2006,26(2):90-92. 被引量:13
  • 2Hongliang T, Rong Z, Xiaojing W,et al. The effects of continuous blood purification for sirs/mods patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled triMs[J]. ISRN Hematol, 2012;2012:986795. doi: 10.5402/2012/986795.
  • 3Morabito S, Pistolesi V, Tritapepe L, et al. Regional citrate antico- agu-lation in cardiac surgery patients at high risk of bleeding: a continuous veno-venous hemofiltration protocol with a law concen- tration citrate solution [J]. Critical Care,2012, 16(3):R111-120.
  • 4Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, et al. Surviving Sepsis Cam- paign: results of an international guideline-based performance im- provement program targeting severe sepsis [J]. Intensive Care Med, 2010, 38 (2): 367-375.
  • 5Bhaskar U, Sterner E, Hickey AM, et al. Engineering of routes to heparin and related polysaccharides[J]. Appl Micrebiol Biotechnol, 2012, 93(1): 1-16.
  • 6Rimmel6 T, Kellum JA. Clinical review: Blood purification for sep- sis [J]. Crit Care,2011, 15(1):205-215.
  • 7Nurmohamed SA, Jallah BP,Vervloet MG,et al. Continuous venove- nous haemofiltration with citrate-buffered replacement solution is safe and efficacious in patients with a bleeding tendency: a prospec- tive observational study[J]. BMC Nephrelogy, 2013, 14:89. doi: 10.1186/1471-2369-14-89.
  • 8Park JS, Kim GH, Kang CM,et al. Regional anticoagulation with citrate is superior to systemic anticoagulation with heparin in critically Ill patients undergoing continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration[J]. Korean J Intern Med,2011, 26(1):68-75. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2011.26. 1.68.
  • 9Rossignol P, Dorval M, Fay R,et al. Rationale and design of the Hep- Zero study:a prespective,muhicenter, international, open, rando- mized, controlled clinical study with parallel groups comparing hep- arin-free dialysis with heparin-coated dialysis membrane (Evodial) versus standard care: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial [J].Trials,2013,14:163-171.
  • 10Bouman CS, de Pont AC, Meijers JC, et al. The effects of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on coagulation activation [J]. Critical Care,2006, 10(5):R150-158.

共引文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部