期刊文献+

非对称信息下政府补贴对双渠道订货决策的影响

Impact of government subsidies on ordering decisions in dual channelunder asymmetric information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对政府补贴和非对称信息下零售商的策略性订货决策,建立由一个上游供应商和在位零售商、新进零售商组成的供应链模型,采用信号博弈模型对比分析无政府补贴和有政府补贴两种情形下的订货量决策.研究表明,政府补贴导致两个零售商的订货量混同均衡不复存在,并且分离均衡也在市场需求波动较大的情况下才会出现.其次,有意思的是,市场需求波动不大的低市场状态下,政府补贴低于某一阈值时两个零售商订货量均小于政府不补贴情形下的订货量.最后,政府补贴会改变上游供应商泄露在位零售商订货量信息的动机,当补贴较低时上游供应商不会泄露其订货信息. Considering the retailer’s strategic ordering decision under government subsidies and asymmetric information,a supply chain model consisting of an upstream supplier,an incumbent retailer and an entrant retailer is established.The two retailers’order quantity decisions without and with government subsidies are analyzed by using the signaling game model.The results show that the pooling equilibrium of the signaling game no longer exists with government subsidy,and the separating equilibrium only appears when the market demand fluctuates greatly.Interestedly,in the low market with little fluctuation,the order quantity of two retailers with subsidy coefficient lower than a certain threshold is less than that without subsidy.Finally,government subsidy changes the motivation of the supplier to disclose the incumbent retailer’s order quantity so that the supplier will not disclose when the subsidy coefficient is relatively low.
作者 李志国 曾鑫钰 Li Zhiguo;Zeng Xinyu(School of Management Science and Engineering,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China;School of Business Adminstration,Chongqing Technology and Business University,Chongqing 400067,China)
出处 《系统工程学报》 CSCD 北大核心 2022年第6期766-781,共16页 Journal of Systems Engineering
基金 国家社会科学基金资助项目(21BGL255).
关键词 非对称信息 政府补贴 双渠道订货决策 供应链管理 asymmetric information government subsidy ordering decision of dual channel supply chain management
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献102

  • 1朱喜,李子奈.改革以来我国农村信贷的效率分析[J].管理世界,2006,22(7):68-76. 被引量:84
  • 2王冀宁,赵顺龙.外部性约束、认知偏差、行为偏差与农户贷款困境——来自716户农户贷款调查问卷数据的实证检验[J].管理世界,2007,23(9):69-75. 被引量:73
  • 3Allen, F, Qian, J, and Qian, M. , 2005, "Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 77 (1), 57-116.
  • 4Ang, J. S. , Cheng, Y, and Wu, C, 2014, "Does Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights Matter in China? Evidence from Financing and Investment Choices in the High-Tech Industry", Review of Economics and Statistics, ol. 96 (2) ,332-348.
  • 5Anton, J, and Yao, Da, 2002, "The Sale of Ideas: Strategic Disclosure, Property Rights, and Contracting", Review of Economic Studies, Vo[.69(3) ,513-531.
  • 6Branstetter, L. , 2007, "China's Financial Markets: An Overview", China's Financial Transition at a Crossroads, 23.
  • 7Chan, L. K., Lakonishok, J., and Sougiannis, T., 2001, " The Stock Market Valuation of Research and Development Expenditures", Journal of Finance, Vol. 56 ( 6 ), 2431-56.
  • 8Cho, J. , and Lee, J. , 2013, "The Venture Capital Certification Role in R&D: Evidence from IPO Underpricing in Korea", Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, Vol. 23,83-108.
  • 9Ciftci, M. , 2010, "Accounting Choice and Earnings Quality: The Case of Software Development", European Accounting Review, Vol. 19(3) ,429-59.
  • 10Czarraitzki, D. , and Hottenrott, H. , 2011, "Financial Constraints: Routine Versus Cutting Edge R&D Investment", Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, Vol. 20( 1 ) ,121-57.

共引文献143

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部