期刊文献+

数字资本主义时代身份政治的生成逻辑和发展演进

The Generation Logic and Evolution of Identity Politics in the Era of Digital Capitalism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 数字资本主义是西方马克思主义描述与分析资本主义新变化的重要概念。当今资本主义正发生着深刻变化,进入以互联网、数字技术和大数据为表征的数字资本主义时代。信息技术和新交往模式的发展,使国家逐渐成为显性的掠夺工具,数字时代国家失去对暴力和话语权的垄断,对国家权威和合法性的质疑催生出以身份政治为特征的资本主义结构性危机。身份政治本质上是一种认同政治。数字资本主义时代社会分离与聚合为以不同身份群体为基础的新阶级群体,促进新阶级社会的出现和阶级政治议题的再次复兴,冲击着西方资本主义的统治基础,资本主义根本性危机正在到来。 With the development of information technology and new communication mode,the state has gradually become a dominant tool of plunder.In the digital age,the state has lost its monopoly on violence and discourse power,and doubts about the authority and legitimacy of the state have spawned a capitalist structural crisis characterized by identity politics.Identity politics is essentially a kind of identity politics.In the era of digital capitalism,social separation and convergence become new class groups based on different identity groups,which promote the emergence of new class society and the revival of class political issues.
作者 孙晓鹤 SUN Xiao-he(Liaocheng University,Liaocheng 252000,China)
出处 《哈尔滨学院学报》 2023年第1期33-37,共5页 Journal of Harbin University
基金 聊城大学习近平总书记“七一”重要讲话精神研究专项,项目编号:321022137。
关键词 数字资本主义 身份政治 阶级身份 阶级政治 Digital capitalism identity politics class identity class politics
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献86

  • 1弗朗西斯·福山,甄成(译),张淦(译).信念式国民身份——应对身份政治带来的民主危机[J].国外社会科学前沿,2019,0(11):22-34. 被引量:8
  • 2阎学通.数字时代的中美战略竞争[J].世界政治研究,2019,0(2):1-18. 被引量:33
  • 3陈昕,黄平.消费主义文化与中国社会[J].上海文学,2000(12):59-61. 被引量:16
  • 4Francis Fukuyama, " America in Decay: The Sources of Political Dysfunction," Foreign Affairs (Sept./Oct. 2014), Vol. 93, No. 5 (Sept. 2014), pp. 5-26.
  • 5Francis Fukuyama, Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of De- mocracy (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux, 2014), p. 505.
  • 6George Tsebelis, Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work ( Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press, 2002).
  • 7David Brady, and Hahrie Han, "Polarlzation Then and Now: A Historical Perspective," in Pietro S. Nivola, and David W. Brady, eds, Red and Blue Nation? Characteristics and Causes of America's Polarized Politics ( Wash- ington, D.C. : Brookings Institution, 2006), pp. 119 - 151.
  • 8Boris Shor and Nolan McCarty, "The Ideological Mapping of A- merican Legislatures," American Political Science Review, Vol. 105, No. 3 ( Aug. ,2011 ) , pp. 530-551.
  • 9Tom S. Clark, "Measuring Ideological Polarization on the United States Supreme Court," Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 62, No. 1 (Mar. 2009), pp. 146-157.
  • 10David Brady and Hahrie Han, "Polarization Then and Now: A HistoricalPerspective," 2006, pp. 119 - 151.

共引文献208

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部