摘要
通过墓志和史书记载的对读,我们发现《裴识墓志》中“凿果得泉”就是裴识在灵武节度使任上的事迹。而通过对唐代墓志的书写习惯、凉州和灵州的关系以及现实的可能性等方面进行分析,我们认为《裴识墓志》从“天子以河西新收西凉府以归,帅张议潮欲强盛边事,择其人(后缺)”一句开始已转入对裴识在灵武节度使任上事迹的记述,这段文字其实是对裴识灵武之任进行解释说明的一部分,并非一些研究者所认为的是指裴识的邠宁之任。而通过对裴识本人的特点(以理财见长的儒臣)、凉州的缺粮特征、凉州从灵州运粮的实际事例以及其他一些方面进行的分析,我们认为裴识的灵武之任是唐朝有意为之,唐朝是有意以一个理财见长的儒臣为灵武节度使来接应缺粮的凉州。唐朝的这一任命是为配合、支持归义军当时在凉州的一系列军事行动。因此,我们认为在凉州收复前后的咸通初年,归义军与唐朝的关系很融洽,唐朝一直在努力接应归义军。
Researchers widely accept that the Tang Dynasty began to suppress the Guiyi Army as the latter recaptured Liangzhou and expanded its power in the 2nd year of the Xiantong Era(861). The Epigraph of Pei Shi, however, reveals a different story. Through a comparison of the epigraph and the historical records as well as an analysis of the writing conventions of the Tang tombstones, the relationship between Liangzhou and Lingzhou and the-then reality, it is found that some sentences in the epigraph are in fact the records of Pei Shi’s deeds in his post of the military commissioner of Lingwu, instead of the same post of Binning as some researchers believe. Given Pei’s personal characteristics(a scholar known for financial management), the food shortage in Liangzhou, and Liangzhou’s gaining food supply from Lingzhou, Pei’s appointment as the military commissioner of Lingwu was a purposeful measure of the Tang to tackle the food shortage and support the military operations of the Guiyi Army in Liangzhou. It is thus concluded that the relationship between the Tang and the Guiyi Army around the 2nd year of the Xiantong era did not deteriorate as some scholars have argued;on the contrary, it was a harmonious one inferred from the fact that the former had been providing solid support for the latter.
作者
孙培岗
SUN Pei-gang(School of History,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)
出处
《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2022年第6期147-157,共11页
Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
关键词
唐朝
归义军
灵武节度使
咸通初年
《裴识墓志》
the Tang Dynasty
the Guiyi Army
the military commissioner of Lingwu
early Xiantong Era
the Epigraph of Peishi