摘要
為确保法律统一正确實施,維護司法公正、提升司法公信力,最高人民法院出台諾多制度翠措提出類案類判。本期聚焦相類案運用的理和實践。曾立城的《類似案件的概念:一個功能主羲的理解》一文韶為,類案類判的支撑價值是裁判的确定性,是一個值得追求的司法目標。但由於類似案件的存在是成性事實,類案類判的實践困境是類案判断標的多元化。作者提出:当待决案件可被涵攝於裁判规,两案就成案。当待决案件未因正性或合法性要求偏離裁判规,案就成强意羲的类案。類案類判及其中國實践,實際上對裁判理提出了更高的司法要求。
To secure the uniform and correct implementation of the law,safeguard judicial fairness and enhance judicial credibility,the Supreme People's Court has introduced a number of institutional measures to propose"similar cases receiving similar adjudications".This issue focuses on the theory and practice of such cases.The Concept of Similar Cases:AFunctionalist Understanding by Zeng Licheng believes that the supporting value ofsimilar cases receiving similar adjudications"lies in the certainty of judgments,a judicial goal worth pursuing.However,the existence of similar cases is a constitutive fact,the practical dilemma of"similar cases receiving similar adjudications"is the diversified judgment standards.The author points out that when pending cases can be included in the judgement rules,the two cases will constitute similar cases.When the pending cases deviate from the rules due to requirements other than correctness or legitimacy,the two cases constitute similar cases in a stronger sense."Similar cases receiving similar adjudications"and its Chinese practice placehigher judicial requirements on judicial reasoning.
作者
曾立城
Zeng Licheng(School of Law of China University of Political Science and Law)
